MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/eat.20539

Медицинская библиотека · The International journal of eating disorders · 2008

Long-term course of binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa: relevance for nosology and diagnostic criteria.

Fichter Manfred M, Quadflieg Norbert, Hedlund Susanne

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To present the twelve-year outcome of binge eating disorder (BED) in 68 female inpatients compared to bulimia nervosa, purging type (BN-P; N = 196).

METHOD: Self and expert ratings focused on the beginning of therapy and the 12-year follow-up.

RESULTS

36% of BED and 28.2% of BN-P patients still received an eating disorder diagnosis at follow-up. Differences between groups were small (Eating Disorder Inventory, Structured Inventory for Anorexic and Bulimic Syndromes, Hopkins Symptom Checklist, Beck Depression Inventory). Similar predictors for BED and BN-P were identified. Psychiatric comorbidity was the predominant predictor of poor outcome in both diagnoses. Predictors for BED outcome were body dissatisfaction, sexual abuse, and impulsivity; self-injury predicted BN-P outcome.

CONCLUSION

Course, outcome, and mortality were similar for BED and BN-P. Both disorders had psychiatric comorbidity as the main predictor of outcome, and there was a diagnostic shift between BED and BN-P over time, pointing to their nosological proximity. Data are relevant for the formulation of DSM-V and ICD-11 diagnostic criteria.

Для цитирования: Fichter Manfred M, Quadflieg Norbert, Hedlund Susanne. Long-term course of binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa: relevance for nosology and diagnostic criteria.. The International journal of eating disorders. 2008. DOI: 10.1002/eat.20539.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.