Radiological physics and technology · 2025
Influence of applicator models on dose distribution in gynecologic high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kishigami Yukako, Ono Tomohiro, Matsushita Norimasa, Hirashima Hideaki, Iramina Hiraku, Adachi Takanori, Nakajima Aya, Tachibana Hidenobu, Mizowaki Takashi, Nakamura Mitsuhiro
Аннотация
This study evaluated the influence of applicator models on dose distribution using Acuros BV (ABV) and the TG-43 protocol for high-dose-rate brachytherapy of gynecologic cancer. First, the dosimetric effects of a tandem and ovoid, tandem cylinder, and multichannel cylinder were evaluated on a water-equivalent phantom using the TG-43 protocol and two methods of applying ABV. One method calculated doses using a source model excluding the applicator model (ABVa), whereas the other included both source and applicator models (ABVb). Second, the doses calculated using ABV were compared with those obtained via TG-43 utilizing 53 clinical plans for gynecologic cancer. Dose-volume parameters were evaluated as per TG-43 for the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) and organs at risk (OARs). A three-dimensional gamma pass rate (GPR) analysis was also conducted between TG-43 and the ABV plans based on a 3%/2 mm criterion with a low-dose threshold of 10%. The dose calculated by TG-43 was the highest, followed by those of ABVa and ABVb. The maximum dose differences between TG-43 and ABVa and between ABVa and ABVb were 10.4% and 11.7%, respectively. Regarding clinical plans, the dose differences between TG-43 and ABV were − 4.6% for HR-CTV and − 5.7 to -4.0% for OARs (all p < 0.05). The median GPR value for the 3%/2 mm criterion was 99.9% (minimum–maximum: 98.7–100.0%). The applicator causes dose attenuation, which also affects the dose distribution within the patient. The transition from TG43 to ABV should be rigorously evaluated to provide an accurate clinical perspective.