Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences · 2025
Can-AP: Informing a system level model for advanced practice implementation in radiation therapy through global experience.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gillan Caitlin, Harnett Nicole
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: This work sought insight from countries at various stages of advanced practice radiation therapy (APRT) implementation, focusing on five system-level elements: practice framework, regulatory structure, educational preparation, certification model, and role implementation.
METHODS: A key informant survey targeted six national academic APRT leaders: Australia, Canada, Singapore, United Kingdom, United States, and France. Likert scale and ranking items considered the order of approach and progress in proposed elements, with additional insight sought in open-ended items.
RESULTS: Practice framework was the most well-addressed element; 4/6 (66.7%) informants believing it was at least "well underway". The development of a regulatory structure was the least well advanced. Singapore's informant believed their country to be furthest along overall, while France was perceived to have progressed the least. Informants tended to believe regulatory structure should be addressed earlier than it had been, while certification could come later, though some noted broader system-level political considerations that might impact advancement. Four informants (66.7%) noted element interreliability, seen to challenge efforts to pursue any individual element alone. All informants noted the value of therapist-led committees to advance elements, and those earlier in APRT journeys (Singapore, United States, France) noted the value of practice frameworks from Canada and the United Kingdom in informing work. Australia, Canada, and the United States proposed adding economic analysis of APRT as a sixth element.
CONCLUSION: APRT integration demonstrates jurisdictional commonalities and nuances that can inform a system-level model. A 'Can-AP' model is proposed that integrates elements and builds clarity, acceptance, credibility, competence, viability, and a common implementation and process reporting standard for global APRT and other health professions exploring advanced practice.
METHODS: A key informant survey targeted six national academic APRT leaders: Australia, Canada, Singapore, United Kingdom, United States, and France. Likert scale and ranking items considered the order of approach and progress in proposed elements, with additional insight sought in open-ended items.
RESULTS: Practice framework was the most well-addressed element; 4/6 (66.7%) informants believing it was at least "well underway". The development of a regulatory structure was the least well advanced. Singapore's informant believed their country to be furthest along overall, while France was perceived to have progressed the least. Informants tended to believe regulatory structure should be addressed earlier than it had been, while certification could come later, though some noted broader system-level political considerations that might impact advancement. Four informants (66.7%) noted element interreliability, seen to challenge efforts to pursue any individual element alone. All informants noted the value of therapist-led committees to advance elements, and those earlier in APRT journeys (Singapore, United States, France) noted the value of practice frameworks from Canada and the United Kingdom in informing work. Australia, Canada, and the United States proposed adding economic analysis of APRT as a sixth element.
CONCLUSION: APRT integration demonstrates jurisdictional commonalities and nuances that can inform a system-level model. A 'Can-AP' model is proposed that integrates elements and builds clarity, acceptance, credibility, competence, viability, and a common implementation and process reporting standard for global APRT and other health professions exploring advanced practice.