MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.17116/stomat20199804125

Медицинская библиотека · Stomatologiia · 2019

[Special aspects of individual oral hygiene in patients with I class gingival recession].

Makeeva I M, Budaychieva Z S, Polyakova M A, Margaryan E G, Novozhilova N E, Musiyev A A

СтатьяОригинал на русском

Аннотация

AIM: To assess the efficacy of additional oral hygiene products in patients with gingival recession.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

30 patients aged from 18 to 35 years with gingival recession participated in the study. The patients were distributed into 2 groups 15 patients in each depending on the use of brushes. The patients in the first group used manual toothbrush Curaprox CS 5460 together with single-tufted brush Curaprox CS 1006 as an additional means of oral hygiene. The patients in the second (control) group used only manual toothbrush Curaprox CS 5460.

RESULTS

No significant differences in the values of Silness-Löe and Navy-Rustogi indixes between groups were found at initial examination (p=0.713). However, the values of these hygienic indexes were significantly lower in the first group compared to the control group after 1 week and 1 month of the study (p<0.001). It was shown that oral hygiene in patients with gingival recession was significantly better in case of use of single-tufted brush.

CONCLUSION

Maximal efficacy of oral hygiene in patients with gingival grade 1 recession can be achieved by using manual toothbrush Curaprox CS 5460 together with single-tufted brush Curaprox CS 1006.

Для цитирования: Makeeva I M, Budaychieva Z S, Polyakova M A, Margaryan E G, Novozhilova N E, Musiyev A A. [Special aspects of individual oral hygiene in patients with I class gingival recession].. Stomatologiia. 2019. DOI: 10.17116/stomat20199804125.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.