Journal of clinical periodontology · 2018
Biologically guided flap stability: the role of flap thickness including periosteum retention on the performance of the coronally advanced flap-A double-blind randomized clinical trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Clementini Marco, Discepoli Nicola, Danesi Carlotta, de Sanctis Massimo
Аннотация
AIM: To evaluate the possible benefit on wound healing and flap stability of periosteum inclusion, comparing a "split-full-split" thickness flap elevation versus a "split" thickness approach performed during CAF for the treatment of isolated-type gingival recessions in the upper jaw.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty patients were randomized, 20 were treated with "split-full-split" (test group) and 20 with a "split" approach (control group). Analysed parameters at 1 year were CRC, percentage of recession coverage (RC), keratinized tissue (KT) gain and patient-related outcome measurements.
RESULTS: After 12 months, CRC was 80% in the test group and 35% in the control group. Percentages of RC and KT gain were higher in the test group, and a significant association between CRC and the thickness of the flap after elevation was found. Patient-related outcomes measurements were better for the test group.
CONCLUSIONS: Flap thickness preservation and the presence of the periosteum in part of the flap may play a fundamental role in obtaining CRC.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty patients were randomized, 20 were treated with "split-full-split" (test group) and 20 with a "split" approach (control group). Analysed parameters at 1 year were CRC, percentage of recession coverage (RC), keratinized tissue (KT) gain and patient-related outcome measurements.
RESULTS: After 12 months, CRC was 80% in the test group and 35% in the control group. Percentages of RC and KT gain were higher in the test group, and a significant association between CRC and the thickness of the flap after elevation was found. Patient-related outcomes measurements were better for the test group.
CONCLUSIONS: Flap thickness preservation and the presence of the periosteum in part of the flap may play a fundamental role in obtaining CRC.