Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2018
Periodontal Evaluation in Noncarious Cervical Lesions Restored with Resin-modified Glass-Ionomer Cement and Resin Composite: A Randomised Controlled Study.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Carvalho Renato Duarte de, Nogueira Camila de Oliveira Picado, Silva Alexandre Pires da, Mesquita Janaina Almeida, Salgado Karla Haila Cortez, Medeiros Maria Cristina Dos Santos, Gurgel Bruno César de Vasconcelos
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess periodontal parameters of noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) restored with glass-ionomer cement (RM-GIC) and composite resin at baseline, three and six months.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with bilateral lesions were included in the study. Lesions (1 mm in depth) were randomly restored with each type of restorative material. Probing depth (PD), relative gingival recession (rGR), relative clinical attachment level (rCAL), visible plaque index (VPI) and gingival bleeding index (GBI) were measured.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found when comparing within groups (p > 0.05). However, the intergroup analysis demonstrated a decrease in GR and rCAL gain for teeth restored with the resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RM-GIC).
CONCLUSION: Both materials behaved similarly when in close contact with periodontal tissues and did not influence periodontal parameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with bilateral lesions were included in the study. Lesions (1 mm in depth) were randomly restored with each type of restorative material. Probing depth (PD), relative gingival recession (rGR), relative clinical attachment level (rCAL), visible plaque index (VPI) and gingival bleeding index (GBI) were measured.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found when comparing within groups (p > 0.05). However, the intergroup analysis demonstrated a decrease in GR and rCAL gain for teeth restored with the resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RM-GIC).
CONCLUSION: Both materials behaved similarly when in close contact with periodontal tissues and did not influence periodontal parameters.