MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5021/ad.2015.27.4.389

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of dermatology · 2015

Patch Testing with Dental Screening Series in Oral Disease.

Kim Tae-Wook, Kim Woo-Il, Mun Je-Ho, Song Margaret, Kim Hoon-Soo, Kim Byung-Soo, Kim Moon-Bum, Ko Hyun-Chang

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The oral mucosa is constantly exposed to several irritants and allergens including dental materials, but the role of contact allergy in oral disease is obscure.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze positive patch test results in patients with oral diseases and evaluate the clinical relevance of oral diseases with contact allergy to dental materials.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patch test results with dental screening series in 44 patients with oral disease from 2004~2011.

RESULTS

Oral diseases included oral lichen planus (54.5%), cheilitis (27.3%), burning mouth syndrome (9.1%), and others (9.1%). Thirty-one of 44 patients (70.5%) had positive reactions to one or more allergens. The most commonly detected allergens were gold sodium thiosulfate (25.0%) and nickel sulfate (25.0%), followed by potassium dichromate (22.7%), cobalt (15.9%), palladium (6.8%), mercury (4.5%), copper (4.5%), and methylhydroquinone (4.5%). Six of 24 patients with oral lichen planus had a symptom in areas adjacent to dental materials and positive patch test reactions to allergens contained in the suspected dental materials.

CONCLUSION

Patch tests with dental screening series are worth considering for oral diseases, especially for oral lichen planus.

Для цитирования: Kim Tae-Wook, Kim Woo-Il, Mun Je-Ho, Song Margaret, Kim Hoon-Soo, Kim Byung-Soo, Kim Moon-Bum, Ko Hyun-Chang. Patch Testing with Dental Screening Series in Oral Disease.. Annals of dermatology. 2015. DOI: 10.5021/ad.2015.27.4.389.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.