International journal of medical informatics · 2024
Prediction of diabetic retinopathy among type 2 diabetic patients in University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, 2006-2021: A prognostic model.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mulat Tebeje Tsion, Kindie Yenit Melaku, Gedlu Nigatu Solomon, Bizuneh Mengistu Segenet, Kidie Tesfie Tigabu, Byadgie Gelaw Negalgn, Moges Chekol Yazachew
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: There has been a paucity of evidence for the development of a prediction model for diabetic retinopathy (DR) in Ethiopia. Predicting the risk of developing DR based on the patient's demographic, clinical, and behavioral data is helpful in resource-limited areas where regular screening for DR is not available and to guide practitioners estimate the future risk of their patients.
METHODS: A retrospective follow-up study was conducted at the University of Gondar (UoG) Comprehensive Specialized Hospital from January 2006 to May 2021 among 856 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Variables were selected using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. The data were validated by 10-fold cross-validation. Four ML techniques (naïve Bayes, K-nearest neighbor, decision tree, and logistic regression) were employed. The performance of each algorithm was measured, and logistic regression was a well-performing algorithm. After multivariable logistic regression and model reduction, a nomogram was developed to predict the individual risk of DR.
RESULTS: Logistic regression was the best algorithm for predicting DR with an area under the curve of 92%, sensitivity of 87%, specificity of 83%, precision of 84%, F1-score of 85%, and accuracy of 85%. The logistic regression model selected seven predictors: total cholesterol, duration of diabetes, glycemic control, adherence to anti-diabetic medications, other microvascular complications of diabetes, sex, and hypertension. A nomogram was developed and deployed as a web-based application. A decision curve analysis showed that the model was useful in clinical practice and was better than treating all or none of the patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The model has excellent performance and a better net benefit to be utilized in clinical practice to show the future probability of having DR. Identifying those with a higher risk of DR helps in the early identification and intervention of DR.
METHODS: A retrospective follow-up study was conducted at the University of Gondar (UoG) Comprehensive Specialized Hospital from January 2006 to May 2021 among 856 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Variables were selected using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. The data were validated by 10-fold cross-validation. Four ML techniques (naïve Bayes, K-nearest neighbor, decision tree, and logistic regression) were employed. The performance of each algorithm was measured, and logistic regression was a well-performing algorithm. After multivariable logistic regression and model reduction, a nomogram was developed to predict the individual risk of DR.
RESULTS: Logistic regression was the best algorithm for predicting DR with an area under the curve of 92%, sensitivity of 87%, specificity of 83%, precision of 84%, F1-score of 85%, and accuracy of 85%. The logistic regression model selected seven predictors: total cholesterol, duration of diabetes, glycemic control, adherence to anti-diabetic medications, other microvascular complications of diabetes, sex, and hypertension. A nomogram was developed and deployed as a web-based application. A decision curve analysis showed that the model was useful in clinical practice and was better than treating all or none of the patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The model has excellent performance and a better net benefit to be utilized in clinical practice to show the future probability of having DR. Identifying those with a higher risk of DR helps in the early identification and intervention of DR.