Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology · 2014
Angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism and gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wei Ming-Tian, Chen Nan, He Ya-Zhou, Wang Jia-Rong, Yang Yang, Guo Xiao-Jiang, Wang Zi-Qiang
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Several studies were launched to investigate the potential function of ACE I/D polymorphism in gastric cancer development and prognosis, but no conclusive results have been obtained. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between ACE I/D polymorphism and gastric cancer.
METHODS: A systemic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and Weipu databases (until October 15,2013) to identify all published records on association between the ACE I/D polymorphism and gastric cancer. We adopted the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) as measure of effect. Meta-analysis was conducted using fixed/random-effects model in STATA 12.0.
RESULTS: Eventually a total of seven studies with 1392 cases and 2951 controls were included in our meta-analysis. No association was detected between ACE I/D polymorphism and gastric cancer susceptibility (DI+DD vs II: OR=1.06, 95%CI=0.92-1.21, P=0.443). However, we found that the DD genotype was significantly associated with increased lymph node metastasis (DD vs DI+II: OR=3.48, CI=1.77-6.85, P<0.001), and more advanced clinical stage (DD vs DI+II: OR=2.43, CI=1.34-4.39, P=0.003) of gastric cancer.
CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that ACE I/D polymorphism could not be directly associated with gastric cancer susceptibility, but might play important role in gastric cancer prognosis. Future studies with larger sample size are warranted for further evaluation.
METHODS: A systemic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and Weipu databases (until October 15,2013) to identify all published records on association between the ACE I/D polymorphism and gastric cancer. We adopted the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) as measure of effect. Meta-analysis was conducted using fixed/random-effects model in STATA 12.0.
RESULTS: Eventually a total of seven studies with 1392 cases and 2951 controls were included in our meta-analysis. No association was detected between ACE I/D polymorphism and gastric cancer susceptibility (DI+DD vs II: OR=1.06, 95%CI=0.92-1.21, P=0.443). However, we found that the DD genotype was significantly associated with increased lymph node metastasis (DD vs DI+II: OR=3.48, CI=1.77-6.85, P<0.001), and more advanced clinical stage (DD vs DI+II: OR=2.43, CI=1.34-4.39, P=0.003) of gastric cancer.
CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that ACE I/D polymorphism could not be directly associated with gastric cancer susceptibility, but might play important role in gastric cancer prognosis. Future studies with larger sample size are warranted for further evaluation.