Oral oncology · 2022
Survival and functional outcomes after total glossectomy with total laryngectomy: Case series from a high-volume tertiary institution.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Burnham Andre J, Boyce Brian J, Kaka Azeem S, El-Deiry Mark W, Sebelik Merry E, Baddour H Michael, Patel Mihir R, Gross Jennifer H, Nathan Meghana, Waller Jonathan M, Schmitt Nicole C, Ottenstein Lauren
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Total glossectomy with total laryngectomy (TGTL) is indicated for some cases of advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma. However, this procedure is rarely performed, as quality of life outcomes are often considered poor. Consequently, few studies to date have reported survival and functional outcomes in patients undergoing TGTL. Here, we present the largest cases series to date of TGTL patients and provide relevant data on survival and functional outcomes.
METHODS: Patients met inclusion criteria if they underwent TGTL (concurrent or staged) indicated for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Patient demographics and disease characteristics, survival outcomes, functional oral intake scores, time to oral intake, gastrostomy tube dependence, and communication methods post-surgery were retrospectively extracted from the electronic medical record.
RESULTS: Survival in patients undergoing TGTL was poor. Most patients in this study were eventually approved for some oral intake of restricted consistencies but remained gastrostomy tube dependent for most of their nutritional needs. Baseline oral intake was suboptimal in most patients but often re-achieved approximately 12 months following surgery. Communication methods following surgery included writing, text-to-speech, and augmentative and alternative communication devices.
CONCLUSION: Our data provide new insights comparing survival and functional outcomes of patients undergoing TGTL. Additional investigation particularly on patient-perceived quality of life following TGTL is needed to better understand the risks and benefits for patients who are candidates for TGTL.
METHODS: Patients met inclusion criteria if they underwent TGTL (concurrent or staged) indicated for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Patient demographics and disease characteristics, survival outcomes, functional oral intake scores, time to oral intake, gastrostomy tube dependence, and communication methods post-surgery were retrospectively extracted from the electronic medical record.
RESULTS: Survival in patients undergoing TGTL was poor. Most patients in this study were eventually approved for some oral intake of restricted consistencies but remained gastrostomy tube dependent for most of their nutritional needs. Baseline oral intake was suboptimal in most patients but often re-achieved approximately 12 months following surgery. Communication methods following surgery included writing, text-to-speech, and augmentative and alternative communication devices.
CONCLUSION: Our data provide new insights comparing survival and functional outcomes of patients undergoing TGTL. Additional investigation particularly on patient-perceived quality of life following TGTL is needed to better understand the risks and benefits for patients who are candidates for TGTL.