Oral oncology · 2022
Application and accuracy of ultrasound-guided resections of tongue cancer.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
de Koning Klijs J, van Es Robert J J, Klijn Reinoud J, Breimer Gerben E, Willem Dankbaar Jan, Braunius Weibel W, van Cann Ellen M, Dieleman François J, Rijken Johannes A, Tijink Bernard M, de Bree Remco, Noorlag Rob
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Surgical removal of squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue (SCCT) with tumour-free margin status (≥5 mm) is essential for loco-regional control. Inadequate margins (<5 mm) often indicate adjuvant treatment, which results in increased morbidity. Ultrasound (US)-guided SCCT resection may be a useful technique to achieve more adequate resection margins compared to conventional surgery. This study evaluates the application and accuracy of this technique.
METHODS: Forty patients with SCCT were included in a consecutive US cohort. During surgery, the surgeon aimed for a 10-mm echographic resection margin, while the tumour border and resection plane were captured in one image. Ex-vivo US measurements of the resection specimen determined whether there was a need for an immediate re-resection. The margin status and the administration of adjuvant treatment were compared those of with a consecutive cohort of 96 tongue cancer patients who had undergone conventional surgery. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was done to assess the optimal margin of ex-vivo US measurements to detect histopathologically inadequate margins.
RESULTS: In the US cohort, the frequency of free margin status was higher than in the conventional cohort (55% vs. 16%, p < 0.001), and the frequency of positive margins status (<1 mm) was lower (5% vs. 15%, respectively, p < 0.001). Adjuvant radiotherapy was halved (10% vs. 21%), and the need for re-resection was comparable (10% vs. 9%). A cut-off value of 8 mm for ex-vivo measurements prevented histopathologically inadequate margins in 76%.
CONCLUSION: US-guided SCCT resections improve margin status and reduce the frequency of adjuvant radiotherapy.
METHODS: Forty patients with SCCT were included in a consecutive US cohort. During surgery, the surgeon aimed for a 10-mm echographic resection margin, while the tumour border and resection plane were captured in one image. Ex-vivo US measurements of the resection specimen determined whether there was a need for an immediate re-resection. The margin status and the administration of adjuvant treatment were compared those of with a consecutive cohort of 96 tongue cancer patients who had undergone conventional surgery. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was done to assess the optimal margin of ex-vivo US measurements to detect histopathologically inadequate margins.
RESULTS: In the US cohort, the frequency of free margin status was higher than in the conventional cohort (55% vs. 16%, p < 0.001), and the frequency of positive margins status (<1 mm) was lower (5% vs. 15%, respectively, p < 0.001). Adjuvant radiotherapy was halved (10% vs. 21%), and the need for re-resection was comparable (10% vs. 9%). A cut-off value of 8 mm for ex-vivo measurements prevented histopathologically inadequate margins in 76%.
CONCLUSION: US-guided SCCT resections improve margin status and reduce the frequency of adjuvant radiotherapy.