JACC. Case reports · 2026
Multidisciplinary Management and Hemodynamic Rescue of Cardiogenic Shock in RCA STEMI With Severe Mitral Regurgitation.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kodesh Afek, Aivasovsky Ivan, Sturla Matteo, Markewitz Noah, Verreault-Julien Louis, Goldstein Daniel J, Latib Azeem, Castagna Francesco, Jorde Ulrich P
Аннотация
CLINICAL CONDITION: A 55-year-old man was admitted with inferior-wall ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. He was found to have multivessel disease with a culprit lesion not amenable for revascularization, new ischemic mitral regurgitation, and cardiogenic shock, prompting the initiation of mechanical circulatory support (MCS). His course was complicated by conduction abnormalities.
KEY QUESTIONS: Some questions for consideration were: 1) Which criteria guide the choice of MCS in patients with complex cardiovascular anatomy and cardiogenic shock? 2) Is coronary artery bypass grafting with concomitant mitral valve repair/replacement superior to percutaneous coronary intervention and mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in patients with poor target vessels and severe mitral regurgitation?
OUTCOME: After initial stabilization with intra-aortic balloon pump, the patient underwent staged percutaneous coronary intervention and mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, leading to resolution of symptoms and disease. He also received a prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in the setting of variable block and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.
TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: This case highlights the importance of multidisciplinary discussions for a patient with complex cardiovascular anatomy requiring MCS and a high level of acute care.
KEY QUESTIONS: Some questions for consideration were: 1) Which criteria guide the choice of MCS in patients with complex cardiovascular anatomy and cardiogenic shock? 2) Is coronary artery bypass grafting with concomitant mitral valve repair/replacement superior to percutaneous coronary intervention and mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in patients with poor target vessels and severe mitral regurgitation?
OUTCOME: After initial stabilization with intra-aortic balloon pump, the patient underwent staged percutaneous coronary intervention and mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, leading to resolution of symptoms and disease. He also received a prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in the setting of variable block and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.
TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: This case highlights the importance of multidisciplinary discussions for a patient with complex cardiovascular anatomy requiring MCS and a high level of acute care.