Comparison of user-friendliness and treatment cost of Loceryl® vs. Ciclopoli®--a patient's perspective.

Topical monotherapy is a valid therapeutic approach in onychomycosis. Due to its lengthy course and its non-reimbursed product status, cost and compliance are important issues and non-pharmacological properties such as over-the-counter price and ease of use should be considered when deciding which product to recommend. We investigated surrogate parameters for patient-friendliness and treatment cost in Germany in a questionnaire-based prospective, comparative, intra-individual, open-label trial of the two common topical antifungal nail lacquers Loceryl(®) (amorolfine 5%) and Ciclopoli(®) (ciclopirox 8%) in eight patients with clinically diagnosed onychomycosis. The 2.5 ml bottle of Loceryl(®) covered a treatment period of 308 days, resulting in treatment costs of €0.10 per day in comparison to the 3.3 ml bottle of Ciclopoli(®), covering 127 days at €0.21 per day, given once-daily application for Ciclopoli(®) and once-weekly application for Loceryl(®) in accordance with regulatory approval. Six out of eight patients favoured the Loceryl(®) treatment regimen. Furthermore, four out of eight patients found Loceryl(®) easier to apply, whereas three preferred Ciclopoli(®). In total, seven out of eight stated a clear preference for Loceryl(®) over Ciclopoli(®). Loceryl(®) therapy is less expensive and less time-consuming. The therapeutic period that can be covered is longer and more patients stated a clear preference for Loceryl(®) in comparison to Ciclopoli(®). The differences are statistically significant, underlining probable clinical relevance.