Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
Heterogeneity of predictive biomarker expression in gastric and esophago-gastric junction carcinoma with peritoneal dissemination.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Angerilli Valentina, Callegarin Matilde, Govoni Ilaria, De Lisi Giuseppe, Paudice Michele, Fugazzola Paola, Vanoli Alessandro, Parente Paola, Bergamo Francesca, Luchini Claudio, Dei Tos Angelo Paolo, Grillo Federica, Lonardi Sara, Mastracci Luca, Spolverato Gaya, Fassan Matteo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Temporal and spatial molecular heterogeneity contributes to resistance to targeted and immune therapies in gastric and esophagogastric junction carcinoma (G/EGJ). This study evaluates differences in biomarker expression between primary G/EGJ and paired peritoneal metastases (PM).
METHODS: We analyzed 74 cases of primary G/EGJ and paired PM using immunohistochemistry for HER2, PD-L1, Claudin18 (CLDN18), DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, p53, E-cadherin, and in situ hybridization for EBER. Biomarker concordance between primary and metastatic tumors was assessed.
RESULTS: Primary G/EGJ were predominantly poorly cohesive (45.9%) or mixed-type (37.8%). Regarding predictive biomarkers, low rates of HER2 overexpression (5.4%), MMR deficiency (4.1%), and EBER positivity (1.4%) were observed, while PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 occurred in 79.7% of cases and CLDN18 positivity was observed in 31.1% of cases. Concordance was perfect for MMR and EBER, while PD-L1 showed the highest discordance (32.4%). HER2 had a low discordance rate (2.7%). CLDN18 exhibited good concordance (86.5%) and showed consistent positivity in PD-L1- and HER2-negative primary tumors (28.6%).
CONCLUSION: G/EGJ with PM show distinct molecular features and spatial heterogeneity, with MMR, EBER, and HER2 demonstrating strong concordance, while PD-L1 showed greater variability. As for novel biomarkers, CLDN18.2 shows substantial concordance between primary G/EGJ and PM and could be a promising target in HER2/PD-L1-negative G/EGJ with PM.
METHODS: We analyzed 74 cases of primary G/EGJ and paired PM using immunohistochemistry for HER2, PD-L1, Claudin18 (CLDN18), DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, p53, E-cadherin, and in situ hybridization for EBER. Biomarker concordance between primary and metastatic tumors was assessed.
RESULTS: Primary G/EGJ were predominantly poorly cohesive (45.9%) or mixed-type (37.8%). Regarding predictive biomarkers, low rates of HER2 overexpression (5.4%), MMR deficiency (4.1%), and EBER positivity (1.4%) were observed, while PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 occurred in 79.7% of cases and CLDN18 positivity was observed in 31.1% of cases. Concordance was perfect for MMR and EBER, while PD-L1 showed the highest discordance (32.4%). HER2 had a low discordance rate (2.7%). CLDN18 exhibited good concordance (86.5%) and showed consistent positivity in PD-L1- and HER2-negative primary tumors (28.6%).
CONCLUSION: G/EGJ with PM show distinct molecular features and spatial heterogeneity, with MMR, EBER, and HER2 demonstrating strong concordance, while PD-L1 showed greater variability. As for novel biomarkers, CLDN18.2 shows substantial concordance between primary G/EGJ and PM and could be a promising target in HER2/PD-L1-negative G/EGJ with PM.