Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
Iodopovidone pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusions: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Muthu Valliappan, Dhooria Sahajal, Sehgal Inderpaul Singh, Prasad Kuruswamy Thurai, Aggarwal Ashutosh N, Agarwal Ritesh
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Chemical pleurodesis is an important option for palliation in malignant pleural effusion (MPE).
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the status of iodopovidone for pleurodesis in MPE.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify studies evaluating the role of iodopovidone for pleurodesis in MPE. We calculated the pooled success rate of iodopovidone pleurodesis from observational studies and the risk ratio (RR) of successful pleurodesis (compared to other agents) from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We pooled the data using the random-effects model. We also assessed the safety of iodopovidone.
RESULTS: We included 26 studies (n = 1132, 15 observational, and 11 RCTs) in our review. The pooled success rate (95% confidence interval [CI]) from 15 observational studies (n = 648) was 90% (86-94). The efficacy rate of iodopovidone was similar with either tube thoracostomy or thoracoscopy. Eleven (n = 484) RCTs compared the efficacy of iodopovidone with other agents (especially bleomycin and talc). We found a similar success rate of iodopovidone compared to other agents with a pooled RR (95% CI) of 0.99 (0.91-1.08). The most frequent adverse event was chest pain. No hypo or hyperthyroidism, or visual disturbance was encountered in any study. There were no deaths attributed to iodopovidone use.
CONCLUSIONS: Iodopovidone is a safe and effective agent for pleurodesis in the management of MPE. Further confirmation is required since the available evidence is limited by the low quality and small sample size of the included studies.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the status of iodopovidone for pleurodesis in MPE.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify studies evaluating the role of iodopovidone for pleurodesis in MPE. We calculated the pooled success rate of iodopovidone pleurodesis from observational studies and the risk ratio (RR) of successful pleurodesis (compared to other agents) from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We pooled the data using the random-effects model. We also assessed the safety of iodopovidone.
RESULTS: We included 26 studies (n = 1132, 15 observational, and 11 RCTs) in our review. The pooled success rate (95% confidence interval [CI]) from 15 observational studies (n = 648) was 90% (86-94). The efficacy rate of iodopovidone was similar with either tube thoracostomy or thoracoscopy. Eleven (n = 484) RCTs compared the efficacy of iodopovidone with other agents (especially bleomycin and talc). We found a similar success rate of iodopovidone compared to other agents with a pooled RR (95% CI) of 0.99 (0.91-1.08). The most frequent adverse event was chest pain. No hypo or hyperthyroidism, or visual disturbance was encountered in any study. There were no deaths attributed to iodopovidone use.
CONCLUSIONS: Iodopovidone is a safe and effective agent for pleurodesis in the management of MPE. Further confirmation is required since the available evidence is limited by the low quality and small sample size of the included studies.