International journal of cardiology · 2014
A novel individualized substrate modification approach for the treatment of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: preliminary results.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Xin-Hua, Li Zheng, Mao Jia-Liang, He Ben
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The most effective approach for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LPAF) ablation remained undetermined. Our goal was to explore the heterogeneous left atrial substrate in patients with LPAF and to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel individualized substrate modification (ISM) approach in LPAF ablation.
METHODS: One hundred and twenty-four patients with LPAF were randomized to ISM group (n=64) or stepwise ablation (SA) group (n=60). After pulmonary vein isolation, ISM was performed in the ISM group and SA was applied in the SA group. The clinical effectiveness after a single and a repeated procedure was compared.
RESULTS: The total procedural time was significantly shorter in ISM than that in SA. In the ISM group, mild left atrial substrate was observed in 17 (27.4%), moderate in 26 (41.9%) and severe in 19 (30.6%) patients after successful cardioversion of the 62 patients. The intention-to-treat analysis showed that sinus rhythm was maintained in 65.5% of patients in the ISM group and in 45.0% of patients in the SA group after a single procedure, P=0.04. Atrial tachycardia (AT) recurred in 5 of 22 in the ISM group and in 20 of 33 in the SA group, P=0.01. After a repeated procedure, 75% of patients in the ISM group and 63.3% of patients in the SA group were free of further recurrence, P=0.16.
CONCLUSIONS: Left atrial substrate varied noticeably in patients with LPAF. The ISM approach was superior to SA approach in terms of procedural time, recurrence rate of AT and clinical effectiveness after a single procedure. However, they yielded comparable outcomes after a repeated procedure.
METHODS: One hundred and twenty-four patients with LPAF were randomized to ISM group (n=64) or stepwise ablation (SA) group (n=60). After pulmonary vein isolation, ISM was performed in the ISM group and SA was applied in the SA group. The clinical effectiveness after a single and a repeated procedure was compared.
RESULTS: The total procedural time was significantly shorter in ISM than that in SA. In the ISM group, mild left atrial substrate was observed in 17 (27.4%), moderate in 26 (41.9%) and severe in 19 (30.6%) patients after successful cardioversion of the 62 patients. The intention-to-treat analysis showed that sinus rhythm was maintained in 65.5% of patients in the ISM group and in 45.0% of patients in the SA group after a single procedure, P=0.04. Atrial tachycardia (AT) recurred in 5 of 22 in the ISM group and in 20 of 33 in the SA group, P=0.01. After a repeated procedure, 75% of patients in the ISM group and 63.3% of patients in the SA group were free of further recurrence, P=0.16.
CONCLUSIONS: Left atrial substrate varied noticeably in patients with LPAF. The ISM approach was superior to SA approach in terms of procedural time, recurrence rate of AT and clinical effectiveness after a single procedure. However, they yielded comparable outcomes after a repeated procedure.