Journal of surgical oncology · 2024
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography as an adjunctive method to ICG lymphography for functional lymphaticovenous anastomosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mo Young Woong, Lee Seung Jun, Lee Dong Won, Lee Won Jai, Im Sang Hee, Suh Young Chul
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography is the reference standard for evaluating lymphedema stage and identifying lymphatic vessels. However, the penetration depth was limited to 1-2 cm from the skin surface. This prospective study compares clinical outcomes following lymphaticovenous anastomoses (LVA) in patients with upper and lower limb lymphedema using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) with ICG as a preoperative imaging modality.
METHODS: Under general anesthesia, Sonazoid® was injected subcutaneously to visualize functional lymphatic channels via CEUS. We analyzed the changes in limb circumference and inter-limb ratio (ILR) using bioimpedance to measure electrical resistance between the CEUS plus ICG group and the ICG-only group to see the effect of CEUS-assisted LVA.
RESULTS: No significant demographic differences existed between the two groups (CEUS plus ICG group vs. ICG-only group). The ILR decrease of the Z1 value measured using bioimpedance was statistically significant (p = 0.042 for the upper limb, p = 0.002 for the lower limb)- CONCLUSIONS: CEUS allowed us to identify deep-lying, functional, and large lymphatic channels. In conclusion, the combination of CEUS and ICG for identifying lymphatic channels has the potential to lead to a more functional lymphovenous anastomosis.
METHODS: Under general anesthesia, Sonazoid® was injected subcutaneously to visualize functional lymphatic channels via CEUS. We analyzed the changes in limb circumference and inter-limb ratio (ILR) using bioimpedance to measure electrical resistance between the CEUS plus ICG group and the ICG-only group to see the effect of CEUS-assisted LVA.
RESULTS: No significant demographic differences existed between the two groups (CEUS plus ICG group vs. ICG-only group). The ILR decrease of the Z1 value measured using bioimpedance was statistically significant (p = 0.042 for the upper limb, p = 0.002 for the lower limb)- CONCLUSIONS: CEUS allowed us to identify deep-lying, functional, and large lymphatic channels. In conclusion, the combination of CEUS and ICG for identifying lymphatic channels has the potential to lead to a more functional lymphovenous anastomosis.