MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s0022215124002135

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2024

Conservative management as a viable alternative in the management of paediatric first branchial arch fistula: a case series.

Garrard Adam, Walker Nathan, Milinis Kris, Mortaja Sarah, Sharma Sunil

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

First branchial arch abnormalities are rare. Surgical excision is the mainstay of treatment and described in the literature. Excision can be associated with significant complications. We describe factors influencing operative and non-operative management of patients.

METHODS

Case review was conducted between January 2012 and September 2022 of patients with first branchial arch abnormalities at Alder Hey Children's Hospital, UK. Analysis of electronic patient records, operation notes and extraction of clinical outcomes were obtained.

RESULTS

Four patients were identified with an average age of 2 years and 4 months. Three were female. Three underwent operative intervention, one of which had a recurrence post-operatively and was manged conservatively. The non-operatively managed patient remains conservatively managed with no complications.

CONCLUSION

First branchial arch abnormalities can be managed operatively and non-operatively, depending on patient factors. Steps to improve surgical planning such as constructive interference in steady state magnetic resonance imaging may help decision making and risk stratification of operative management.

Для цитирования: Garrard Adam, Walker Nathan, Milinis Kris, Mortaja Sarah, Sharma Sunil. Conservative management as a viable alternative in the management of paediatric first branchial arch fistula: a case series.. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 2024. DOI: 10.1017/s0022215124002135.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.