How Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Compares to Traditional Simulation: A Qualitative Investigation of Pediatric Resident Perceptions.

OBJECTIVES

Rapid cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) is a type of within-simulation debriefing that alternates between specific practice and targeted feedback. While RCDP has become increasingly used in conjunction with traditional debriefing, little is known about specific contexts in which RCDP might be most useful. Therefore, our objective was to explore learners' perceptions of RCDP versus traditional simulation, with focus on differences in learning and psychological safety.

METHODS

Pediatric residents at a large pediatric residency program attended simulation trainings with both RCDP and traditional simulations as a part of their pre-established simulation curricula. Graduating residents in the 2024 to 2025 class were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews exploring their experiences with each type of simulation. Transcripts were analyzed via an inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Fifteen interviews yielded 2 major themes: (1) Residents identified unique roles for RCDP and traditional simulation. Subthemes included each style teaches different skills, allows for practice with varying cognitive loads, and progresses towards more realistic scenarios. (2) Residents valued the psychological safety of RCDP but also recognized growth through discomfort in traditional simulation. Subthemes for the second major theme included that psychological safety of RCDP is achieved through breaks and repeated practice, and the value of growth through discomfort.

CONCLUSIONS

Both styles of simulation are valuable in curricula but might be best utilized in specific contexts. Educators should intentionally choose a simulation style with special consideration of a simulation's learning objectives and participants' experience.