MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00264-013-2204-y

Медицинская библиотека · International orthopaedics · 2013

Human evolution and tears of the rotator cuff.

Craik Johnathan D, Mallina Ravi, Ramasamy Vijayraj, Little Nick J

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Humans differ from other great ape species in their propensity to develop tears of the rotator cuff. The aim of this study was to compare the anatomical risk factors for subacromial impingement and rotator cuff tears amongst the great apes and to determine which features may be accentuated in humans and therefore play a more significant role in disease aetiology.

METHODS

Orthogonal digital photographs of 22 human, 17 gorilla, 13 chimpanzee and 12 orangutan dry bone scapula specimens oriented in the glenoid plane were taken. Anatomical measurements were preformed using a calibrated digital image technique and the results scaled according to scapula vertebral border length.

RESULTS

Of the ten anatomical features associated with subacromial impingement and rotator cuff tears in humans, none were shown to be accentuated and significantly different to the other species studied. However the human supraspinatus fossa was shown to be significantly smaller.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that an alternative primary aetiological factor for rotator cuff tears must exist. A reduction in the size of the supraspinatus fossa in human scapulae suggests that structural insufficiency of the supraspinatus or a change in rotator cuff force vectors could play a role.

Для цитирования: Craik Johnathan D, Mallina Ravi, Ramasamy Vijayraj, Little Nick J. Human evolution and tears of the rotator cuff.. International orthopaedics. 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2204-y.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.