MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/oem.2004.015685

Медицинская библиотека · Occupational and environmental medicine · 2005

Sensitisation to mites in laboratory animal workers with rhinitis.

Ruoppi P, Koistinen T, Pennanen S

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIMS: To determine the frequency of sensitisation to mites among rhinitic laboratory animal workers and to clarify whether sensitisation could be occupational.

METHODS

Skin prick tests (SPT) were performed in 40 subjects who were working with laboratory animals in Kuopio University research units and who had been referred to Kuopio University Hospital for work related rhinitis. The SPT panel consisted of three storage mites, two house dust mites, 11 other common environmental airborne allergens, latex, and 2-4 individually relevant laboratory animals. To determine signs of mites in animal facilities, guanine was determined in 22 dust samples taken from feedstuffs or bedding material used for laboratory animals and from rooms where these materials were stored and handled.

RESULTS

Positive SPT results were found in 35 out of 40 workers: in 14 for storage mites, four for house dust mites, 25 for other common aeroallergens, as well as positive reactions to laboratory animals in 19 individuals. The guanine test was positive, indicating the presence of mite derived material in 21 out of 22 dust samples.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that subjects who are occupationally exposed to laboratory animals are also exposed to mite derived allergens. Sensitisation to mites is common and may be work related.

Для цитирования: Ruoppi P, Koistinen T, Pennanen S. Sensitisation to mites in laboratory animal workers with rhinitis.. Occupational and environmental medicine. 2005. DOI: 10.1136/oem.2004.015685.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.