Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry · 2013
General in-situation safety behaviors are uniquely associated with post-event processing.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mitchell Melissa A, Schmidt Norman B
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Research suggests that state anxiety and in-situation safety behaviors are associated with post-event processing (PEP) in social anxiety. Past research has obtained mixed results on whether one or both factors contribute to PEP. The current investigation evaluated state anxiety and in-situation safety behaviors (including subtypes of in-situation safety behaviors) simultaneously to determine their relative contributions to PEP.
METHODS: A prospective study assessed social anxiety, state anxiety, in-situation safety behaviors, PEP, and depression in the context of a speech stressor.
RESULTS: Consistent with theory, in-situation safety behaviors were uniquely associated with greater PEP. State anxiety was not uniquely associated with PEP. Furthermore, restricting and active subtypes of in-situation safety behaviors showed specificity to PEP.
LIMITATIONS: Limitations of the present study include the use of a nonclinical analog sample and retrospective reporting of PEP.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the importance of research on in-situation safety behaviors as a potential contributor to PEP.
METHODS: A prospective study assessed social anxiety, state anxiety, in-situation safety behaviors, PEP, and depression in the context of a speech stressor.
RESULTS: Consistent with theory, in-situation safety behaviors were uniquely associated with greater PEP. State anxiety was not uniquely associated with PEP. Furthermore, restricting and active subtypes of in-situation safety behaviors showed specificity to PEP.
LIMITATIONS: Limitations of the present study include the use of a nonclinical analog sample and retrospective reporting of PEP.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the importance of research on in-situation safety behaviors as a potential contributor to PEP.