Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association · 2020
Provocation of the ocular surface to investigate the evaporative pathophysiology of dry eye disease.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bilkhu Paramdeep, Wolffsohn James, Purslow Christine
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate whether standard clinical measures of tear film stability, meniscus height and symptomology reflect changes in evaporation rate induced by ocular surface provocations.
METHODS: Forty participants (23.8 ± 4.5 years, 53 % female) with healthy to mild dry eyes underwent two tear film provocations in random sequence on separate occasions: playing a tablet computer high concentration game (http://slither.io/) for 30 min; and receiving treatment with humidity goggles for 10 min followed by liposomal spray application. Measures at baseline and 30 min later were: Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) questionnaire, tear film lipid layer thickness (LLT), non-invasive tear film break-up time (NIBUT), tear meniscus height (TMH), dynamic tear film lipid layer pattern (DLP) and tear film evaporation (TFE).
RESULTS: There were no differences in the baseline measurements before each provocation (p > 0.05). Dry eye symptoms significantly worsened with concentration task (p < 0.001) and improved with treatment (p < 0.001). DLP and LLT significantly increased with treatment (p < 0.05), but was unaffected with the concentration task (p > 0.05). NIBUT declined with the concentration task (p = 0.015), but was not enhanced with treatment (p = 0.142). TMH increased after treatment (p = 0.001) and decreased with the concentration task (p = 0.006). While evaporation decreased with the concentration task (p < 0.001), treatment had no effect (p = 0.333). LLT was associated with evaporation (p = 0.036) and additionally with symptom severity (p = 0.002) and tear volume (p = 0.017).
CONCLUSIONS: Sub-classifying dry eye based on an 'evaporative' component to inform treatment seems over-simplistic. However objective TMH, NIBUT and LLT seem to be the key clinical metrics that drive ocular comfort.
METHODS: Forty participants (23.8 ± 4.5 years, 53 % female) with healthy to mild dry eyes underwent two tear film provocations in random sequence on separate occasions: playing a tablet computer high concentration game (http://slither.io/) for 30 min; and receiving treatment with humidity goggles for 10 min followed by liposomal spray application. Measures at baseline and 30 min later were: Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) questionnaire, tear film lipid layer thickness (LLT), non-invasive tear film break-up time (NIBUT), tear meniscus height (TMH), dynamic tear film lipid layer pattern (DLP) and tear film evaporation (TFE).
RESULTS: There were no differences in the baseline measurements before each provocation (p > 0.05). Dry eye symptoms significantly worsened with concentration task (p < 0.001) and improved with treatment (p < 0.001). DLP and LLT significantly increased with treatment (p < 0.05), but was unaffected with the concentration task (p > 0.05). NIBUT declined with the concentration task (p = 0.015), but was not enhanced with treatment (p = 0.142). TMH increased after treatment (p = 0.001) and decreased with the concentration task (p = 0.006). While evaporation decreased with the concentration task (p < 0.001), treatment had no effect (p = 0.333). LLT was associated with evaporation (p = 0.036) and additionally with symptom severity (p = 0.002) and tear volume (p = 0.017).
CONCLUSIONS: Sub-classifying dry eye based on an 'evaporative' component to inform treatment seems over-simplistic. However objective TMH, NIBUT and LLT seem to be the key clinical metrics that drive ocular comfort.