Arrhythmic risk prediction in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: external validation of the arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy risk calculator.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jordà Paloma, Bosman Laurens P, Gasperetti Alessio, Mazzanti Andrea, Gourraud Jean Baptiste, Davies Brianna, Frederiksen Tanja Charlotte, Weidmann Zoraida Moreno, Di Marco Andrea, Roberts Jason D, MacIntyre Ciorsti, Seifer Colette, Delinière Antoine, Alqarawi Wael, Kukavica Deni, Minois Damien, Trancuccio Alessandro, Arnaud Marine, Targetti Mattia, Martino Annamaria, Oliviero Giada, Pipilas Daniel C, Carbucicchio Corrado, Compagnucci Paolo, Dello Russo Antonio, Olivotto Iacopo, Calò Leonardo, Lubitz Steven A, Cutler Michael J, Chevalier Philippe, Arbelo Elena, Priori Silvia Giuliana, Healey Jeffrey S, Calkins Hugh, Casella Michela, Jensen Henrik Kjærulf, Tondo Claudio, Tadros Rafik, James Cynthia A, Krahn Andrew D, Cadrin-Tourigny Julia
Аннотация
METHODS AND RESULTS: In a retrospective cohort of 429 individuals from 29 centres in North America and Europe, 103 (24%) experienced sustained VA during a median follow-up of 5.02 (2.05-7.90) years following diagnosis of ARVC. External validation yielded good discrimination [C-index of 0.70 (95% confidence interval-CI 0.65-0.75)] and calibration slope of 1.01 (95% CI 0.99-1.03). Compared with the three published consensus-based decision algorithms for ICD use in ARVC (Heart Rhythm Society consensus on arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, International Task Force consensus statement on the treatment of ARVC, and American Heart Association guidelines for VA and SCD), the risk calculator performed better with a superior net clinical benefit below risk threshold of 35%.
CONCLUSION: Using a large independent cohort of patients, this study shows that the ARVC risk model provides good prognostic information and outperforms other published decision algorithms for ICD use. These findings support the use of the model to facilitate shared decision making regarding ICD implantation in the primary prevention of SCD in ARVC.