MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/wco.0000000000001105

Медицинская библиотека · Current opinion in neurology · 2022

Sensory neuronopathies, diagnostic criteria and causes.

Antoine Jean-Christophe

СтатьяОбзорПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To stress on the diagnostic strategy of sensory neuronopathies (SNN), including new genes and antibodies.

RECENT FINDING: SNN involve paraneoplastic, dysimmune, toxic, viral and genetic mechanisms. About one-third remains idiopathic. Recently, new antibodies and genes have reduced this proportion. Anti-FGFR3 and anti-AGO antibodies are not specific of SNN, although SNN is predominant and may occur with systemic autoimmune diseases. These antibodies are the only marker of an underlying dysimmune context in two-thirds (anti-FGFR3 antibodies) and one-third of the cases (anti-AGO antibodies), respectively. Patients with anti-AGO antibodies may improve with treatment, which is less clear with anti-FGFR3 antibodies. A biallelic expansion in the RFC1 gene is responsible for the cerebellar ataxia, neuropathy, vestibular areflexia syndrome (CANVAS) in which SNN is a predominant manifestation. Most of the patients have an adult onset and are sporadic. The RFC1 mutation may represent one-third of idiopathic sensory neuropathies. Finally, the criteria for the diagnosis of paraneoplastic SNN have recently been updated.

SUMMARY: The diagnostic of SNN relies on criteria distinguishing SNN from other neuropathies. The strategy in search of their cause now needs to include these recent findings.

Для цитирования: Antoine Jean-Christophe. Sensory neuronopathies, diagnostic criteria and causes.. Current opinion in neurology. 2022. DOI: 10.1097/wco.0000000000001105.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.