Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine · 2025
Targeting the hip and/or knee extensors during the back squat in males and females: A repeated measures decision tree analysis using the relative difference in trunk and tibia inclination and knee flexion angle.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Straub Rachel K, Barrack Adam J, Cannon Jordan, Powers Christopher M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine what combination of relative trunk and tibia inclination and knee flexion biases the hip and knee extensors during the squat.
DESIGN: Repeated measures.
SETTING: University research laboratory.
PARTICIPANTS: 16 healthy individuals.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The average hip/knee extensor moment ratio (HKR) was calculated during squat descent, and trunk-tibia inclination difference and knee flexion angle at peak knee flexion. A regression tree for repeated measures determined what combination of trunk-tibia inclination difference and knee flexion angle predicted HKR.
RESULTS: HKR was predicted by trunk-tibia inclination difference (primary predictor) and knee flexion (secondary predictor). Four squatting strategies emerged: knee extensor bias (average HKR = 0.3), neutral bias (average HKR = 0.9), hip extensor bias (average HKR = 1.5), and high hip extensor bias (average HKR = 2.2). When trunk inclination exceeded tibia inclination ( ≥ 2.2°), hip-biased squatting was evident. Squat depth affected only hip-biased squatting: high hip extensor bias at moderate depths (<96° knee flexion), and a less pronounced hip bias at greater depths ( ≥ 96° knee flexion).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide a framework to bias the squat exercise based on intent. To maximize or minimize hip relative to knee extensor demands, clinicians should be cognizant of the trunk inclination relative to tibia inclination and the influence of knee flexion.
DESIGN: Repeated measures.
SETTING: University research laboratory.
PARTICIPANTS: 16 healthy individuals.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The average hip/knee extensor moment ratio (HKR) was calculated during squat descent, and trunk-tibia inclination difference and knee flexion angle at peak knee flexion. A regression tree for repeated measures determined what combination of trunk-tibia inclination difference and knee flexion angle predicted HKR.
RESULTS: HKR was predicted by trunk-tibia inclination difference (primary predictor) and knee flexion (secondary predictor). Four squatting strategies emerged: knee extensor bias (average HKR = 0.3), neutral bias (average HKR = 0.9), hip extensor bias (average HKR = 1.5), and high hip extensor bias (average HKR = 2.2). When trunk inclination exceeded tibia inclination ( ≥ 2.2°), hip-biased squatting was evident. Squat depth affected only hip-biased squatting: high hip extensor bias at moderate depths (<96° knee flexion), and a less pronounced hip bias at greater depths ( ≥ 96° knee flexion).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide a framework to bias the squat exercise based on intent. To maximize or minimize hip relative to knee extensor demands, clinicians should be cognizant of the trunk inclination relative to tibia inclination and the influence of knee flexion.