The Journal of arthroplasty · 2020
Retrieval Analysis of Cruciate-Retaining and Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty and Correlations to Laxity and Wear.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Perkins Meredith R, Arnholt Christina M, MacDonald Daniel W, Kurtz Steven M, Mihalko William M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with posterior-stabilized (PS) or posterior cruciate-retaining (CR) implants has high success rates and survivorship. However, it is uncertain how laxity and constraint are associated with long-term polyethylene wear under physiological conditions.
METHODS: To answer this question, we measured the laxity patterns of 47 harvested cadaver specimens with primary TKAs in a custom knee-testing machine at full extension and at 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. The wear patterns of the tibial inserts were assessed using a semiquantitative method which is a modified approach of that proposed by Hood et al in 1983.
RESULTS: Statistical analysis found that the PS TKA cohort had a statistically significant increase in varus laxity at 60° and 90° of flexion, as well as total coronal laxity at 60° of flexion when compared to the CR cohort. Furthermore, analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between increased PS coronal laxity and increased tibial wear, a trend that was not seen in the CR specimens.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that greater laxity in flexion after primary TKA may increase the wear realized over time and that PS TKAs may be more susceptible due to the loss of support the PCL affords to the flexion space. Whether a CR or PS TKA is used, surgeons need to avoid the pitfalls that may create greater flexion laxity during the procedure to optimize long-term polyethylene wear.
METHODS: To answer this question, we measured the laxity patterns of 47 harvested cadaver specimens with primary TKAs in a custom knee-testing machine at full extension and at 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. The wear patterns of the tibial inserts were assessed using a semiquantitative method which is a modified approach of that proposed by Hood et al in 1983.
RESULTS: Statistical analysis found that the PS TKA cohort had a statistically significant increase in varus laxity at 60° and 90° of flexion, as well as total coronal laxity at 60° of flexion when compared to the CR cohort. Furthermore, analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between increased PS coronal laxity and increased tibial wear, a trend that was not seen in the CR specimens.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that greater laxity in flexion after primary TKA may increase the wear realized over time and that PS TKAs may be more susceptible due to the loss of support the PCL affords to the flexion space. Whether a CR or PS TKA is used, surgeons need to avoid the pitfalls that may create greater flexion laxity during the procedure to optimize long-term polyethylene wear.