Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2022
Optical coherence tomography assessment of acute thrombogenicity at bifurcation sites using different stenting techniques: A porcine arteriovenous shunt study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dan Kazuhiro, Bhogal Sukhdeep, Kuku Kayode O, Melaku Gebremedhin D, Devineni Aditya, Hellinga David, Waksman Ron, Garcia-Garcia Hector M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare bare-metal stents (BMS), durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES), and abluminal biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (ABP-SES) in the bifurcation model setup.
BACKGROUND: The mechanism of thrombogenicity, which differs among second-generation stents implanted using double-kissing (DK) crush or culotte stenting techniques, remains unclear. We have shown previously that setting up a porcine arteriovenous shunt model is feasible and useful to assess thrombogenicity at vessel bifurcation points.
METHODS: Six porcine shunt models were prepared for the comparison between DK crush and culotte stenting techniques using BMS, DP-EES, and ABP-SES. Intracoronary imaging with high-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed to evaluate the thrombogenicity in different stent types in the bifurcation stenting model and was evaluated by a core lab.
RESULTS: Culotte stenting demonstrated more thrombogenicity at the proximal main branch (MB) with DP-EES, side branch (SB) with BMS, and the bifurcation site irrespective of the stent type, while DK crush technique exhibited thrombogenicity only at SB with BMS and ABP-SES. OCT analysis revealed malapposition of DP-EES in the proximal MB with culotte stenting. Stent expansion was generally larger in ABP-SES than BMS and DP-EES.
CONCLUSIONS: The study provides hypothesis-generating findings in distinct thrombogenicity of bifurcation stenting with DP- or ABP-coated drug-eluting stents.
BACKGROUND: The mechanism of thrombogenicity, which differs among second-generation stents implanted using double-kissing (DK) crush or culotte stenting techniques, remains unclear. We have shown previously that setting up a porcine arteriovenous shunt model is feasible and useful to assess thrombogenicity at vessel bifurcation points.
METHODS: Six porcine shunt models were prepared for the comparison between DK crush and culotte stenting techniques using BMS, DP-EES, and ABP-SES. Intracoronary imaging with high-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed to evaluate the thrombogenicity in different stent types in the bifurcation stenting model and was evaluated by a core lab.
RESULTS: Culotte stenting demonstrated more thrombogenicity at the proximal main branch (MB) with DP-EES, side branch (SB) with BMS, and the bifurcation site irrespective of the stent type, while DK crush technique exhibited thrombogenicity only at SB with BMS and ABP-SES. OCT analysis revealed malapposition of DP-EES in the proximal MB with culotte stenting. Stent expansion was generally larger in ABP-SES than BMS and DP-EES.
CONCLUSIONS: The study provides hypothesis-generating findings in distinct thrombogenicity of bifurcation stenting with DP- or ABP-coated drug-eluting stents.