MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000368334

Медицинская библиотека · Neuroepidemiology · 2014

Incidence rates of cranial tremors in essential tremor: a prospective, longitudinal study.

Michalec Monika, Gillman Art, Louis Elan D

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Cranial (head, jaw) tremors develop in a sizable number of essential tremor (ET) patients. They are particularly important because they are a significant source of embarrassment and are especially resistant to treatment. There are no data on the rate at which ET patients develop these cranial tremors. Our aim was to estimate the incidence rate of head and jaw tremors in ET.

METHODS

Cases, enrolled in a prospective, longitudinal study, were evaluated at baseline and one follow-up visit. The in-person evaluation included questionnaires and a videotaped neurological examination, which was reviewed by a senior movement disorder neurologist for the presence/absence of head and jaw tremors. The mean time between baseline and follow-up assessments was 6.3 ± 2.4 (median = 6.0; range = 1.5-12.4 years).

RESULTS

Five (6.3%) of 79 cases developed head tremor by follow-up (incidence rate = 1,012 per 100,000 person years; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0-3,219). Twelve (10.6%) of 113 cases developed jaw tremor by follow-up (incidence rate = 1,692 per 100,000 person years; 95% CI = 0-1,692).

CONCLUSION

These epidemiological data were designed to assist physicians in counseling ET patients when they ask about their risks of developing cranial tremors.

Для цитирования: Michalec Monika, Gillman Art, Louis Elan D. Incidence rates of cranial tremors in essential tremor: a prospective, longitudinal study.. Neuroepidemiology. 2014. DOI: 10.1159/000368334.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.