Economics of surgery.

The time has come to subject surgery to the same rigours of economic assessment that other health-care sectors are already receiving--namely, the comparative assessment of costs and benefits. The surgical management of gallstones provides a good example of the role of economics in surgery. Gallstone disease is common and patients are usually referred to a surgeon, but the threshold for intervention is not agreed and varies widely, with considerable implications for resources. Gallstone removal has been subject to much innovation over the past 10 years, yet economic assessment of laparoscopic and "mini" cholecystectomy and of gallstone lithotripsy is rare, despite the fact that operation rates have increased by up to 50% in some countries. For surgery to compete with other interventions, economic assessment of new surgical techniques will be increasingly important. This assessment should be based on well-conducted clinical trials in which interventions are provided in a routine service setting, and in which benefits are assessed among other things on the basis of the patient's perceived quality of life. Economic assessment often needs data beyond those collected in a clinical trial, however pragmatic the trial design, so modelling will often be required, incorporating a range of sources of evidence. Finally, evidence alone will not be enough to promote cost-effective practices. The take-up of surgical techniques will always be affected by the way hospitals and surgeons are remunerated. Affecting practice requires a realistic system of reimbursement that reflects evidence on cost effectiveness.