Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas · 1999
Prospective evaluation of selective intraoperative cholangiography in preventing retained stones.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Martín Díaz M, Yuste Osorio E, Ferrer García G, Gómez Arroyo A, Hidalgo Garrido J, Herrera Fernández F, Hermoso Torres J, Izagoñola De Miguel J f, Jiménez Ríos J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of selective intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) during gallstone surgery in preventing retained bile duct stones. We reviewed the design and application of our procedure for deciding when to use IOC.
METHODS: This was a prospective, 4-year observational study with delayed cohort evaluation after a follow-up period of 2-6 years. We studied 672 consecutive patients who underwent cholecystectomy at the General Surgery Unit of the Motril Hospital in Motril (Granada province), Spain, because of symptomatic cholelithiasis. The study period was from September 1991 (when we adopted a protocol to select patients for IOC) to June 1995. Clinical, biochemical and ultrasonographic data, operative findings, and clinical and early postoperative data were collected prospectively. Follow-up clinical evaluation was done by personal, postal or telephone interview. Biochemical, sonographic and (when available) endoscopic examinations were done for patients suspected of having residual bile duct stones.
RESULTS: Intraoperative cholangiography was not done during simple cholecystectomy in 453 patients. In 335 of these patients this decision was correct, and only 1 case of suspected residual stone was found (0.3%). In the other 188 patients the decision to omit IOC was arbitrary (i.e., not based on the protocol); among these patients we found 5 cases (2 suspected and 3 proven) of residual stones (4.2%). The difference was significant according to Fisher's exact test (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: In some patients who undergo cholecystectomy, IOC may be omitted without major risk of retained duct stones. Patients in whom IOC will not be done must be selected strictly according to a well-designed protocol to avoid increasing the risk perceptibly.
METHODS: This was a prospective, 4-year observational study with delayed cohort evaluation after a follow-up period of 2-6 years. We studied 672 consecutive patients who underwent cholecystectomy at the General Surgery Unit of the Motril Hospital in Motril (Granada province), Spain, because of symptomatic cholelithiasis. The study period was from September 1991 (when we adopted a protocol to select patients for IOC) to June 1995. Clinical, biochemical and ultrasonographic data, operative findings, and clinical and early postoperative data were collected prospectively. Follow-up clinical evaluation was done by personal, postal or telephone interview. Biochemical, sonographic and (when available) endoscopic examinations were done for patients suspected of having residual bile duct stones.
RESULTS: Intraoperative cholangiography was not done during simple cholecystectomy in 453 patients. In 335 of these patients this decision was correct, and only 1 case of suspected residual stone was found (0.3%). In the other 188 patients the decision to omit IOC was arbitrary (i.e., not based on the protocol); among these patients we found 5 cases (2 suspected and 3 proven) of residual stones (4.2%). The difference was significant according to Fisher's exact test (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: In some patients who undergo cholecystectomy, IOC may be omitted without major risk of retained duct stones. Patients in whom IOC will not be done must be selected strictly according to a well-designed protocol to avoid increasing the risk perceptibly.