Neuroepidemiology · 2013
When do essential tremor patients develop head tremor? Influences of age and duration and evidence of a biological clock.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Louis Elan D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Essential tremor (ET) is a chronic, progressive neurological disease. Head (neck) tremor may eventually develop in as many as 30-60% of patients, yet it is unclear why. Is its appearance merely a function of advancing disease duration? Alternatively, is patient age a primary factor? The latter would argue for the presence of a biological clock that is important for the expression of this clinical feature of ET.
METHODS: A total of 363 ET patients were enrolled in a cross-sectional, clinical-epidemiological study. Each ET patient underwent a 20-min videotaped neurological examination which included an assessment of the presence/absence of head tremor.
RESULTS: Head tremor was present on examination in 140 (38.6%) patients. Young patients, even with longer-duration tremor, rarely had head tremor: 2/27 (7.4%) patients<40 years old with tremor duration≥10 years had head tremor versus 121/283 (42.8%) older patients (>60 years old) with tremor duration≥10 years (p<0.001). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, while head tremor was associated with age (p<0.001) it was not independently associated with tremor duration (p=0.26); interestingly, it was associated with gender in that model (p<0.001). With the exception of 1 patient, head tremor did not begin before the age of 36.
CONCLUSIONS: Data suggest that the appearance of head tremor in ET depends on a biological factor that is intrinsic to the patient (i.e. age) and is not a clear consequence of advancing disease duration.
METHODS: A total of 363 ET patients were enrolled in a cross-sectional, clinical-epidemiological study. Each ET patient underwent a 20-min videotaped neurological examination which included an assessment of the presence/absence of head tremor.
RESULTS: Head tremor was present on examination in 140 (38.6%) patients. Young patients, even with longer-duration tremor, rarely had head tremor: 2/27 (7.4%) patients<40 years old with tremor duration≥10 years had head tremor versus 121/283 (42.8%) older patients (>60 years old) with tremor duration≥10 years (p<0.001). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, while head tremor was associated with age (p<0.001) it was not independently associated with tremor duration (p=0.26); interestingly, it was associated with gender in that model (p<0.001). With the exception of 1 patient, head tremor did not begin before the age of 36.
CONCLUSIONS: Data suggest that the appearance of head tremor in ET depends on a biological factor that is intrinsic to the patient (i.e. age) and is not a clear consequence of advancing disease duration.