Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987) · 2006
Imaging characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma using the hepatobiliary contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPA.
Клиническое исследование III фазыСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jung G, Breuer J, Poll L W, Koch J A, Balzer T, Chang S, Mödder U
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with Gd-EOB-DTPA in comparison with non-enhanced imaging and spiral computed tomography (CT) to provide additional information for classification and characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty patients with histopathology-proven hepatocellular carcinoma were selected for this subgroup analysis from a phase-III multicenter study in 235 patients with known or suspected liver lesions. The primary analysis was comparison of the proportion of hepatocellular carcinoma correctly classified and characterized by combined pre-/post-contrast MRI compared with pre-contrast MRI alone or with spiral CT. All images were evaluated on site, and in a blinded reading by three independent readers off site.
RESULTS: In the on-site evaluation, the lesions were correctly classified as a malignant tumor with combined MRI in 90.3%, with pre-contrast imaging alone in 82.9% and with spiral CT in 87.8% (n.s.). The proportion of correct characterization (lesion type diagnosis) with combined MRI was 85.4%, 75.6% for pre-contrast imaging, and 77.5% for spiral CT (n.s.), respectively. In the blinded reading, one reader showed a significant increase in the proportion of correctly characterized lesions by 27% (P<0.05). The other two readers showed a reduction in the proportion of correct characterization by 12% and 15%, respectively (n.s.).
CONCLUSION: With regard to lesion classification, no difference was found between combined pre-/post-contrast MRI and spiral CT. A non-significant trend in favor of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI with regard to characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma was found, although the CT scans were not optimized as the MRI scans.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty patients with histopathology-proven hepatocellular carcinoma were selected for this subgroup analysis from a phase-III multicenter study in 235 patients with known or suspected liver lesions. The primary analysis was comparison of the proportion of hepatocellular carcinoma correctly classified and characterized by combined pre-/post-contrast MRI compared with pre-contrast MRI alone or with spiral CT. All images were evaluated on site, and in a blinded reading by three independent readers off site.
RESULTS: In the on-site evaluation, the lesions were correctly classified as a malignant tumor with combined MRI in 90.3%, with pre-contrast imaging alone in 82.9% and with spiral CT in 87.8% (n.s.). The proportion of correct characterization (lesion type diagnosis) with combined MRI was 85.4%, 75.6% for pre-contrast imaging, and 77.5% for spiral CT (n.s.), respectively. In the blinded reading, one reader showed a significant increase in the proportion of correctly characterized lesions by 27% (P<0.05). The other two readers showed a reduction in the proportion of correct characterization by 12% and 15%, respectively (n.s.).
CONCLUSION: With regard to lesion classification, no difference was found between combined pre-/post-contrast MRI and spiral CT. A non-significant trend in favor of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI with regard to characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma was found, although the CT scans were not optimized as the MRI scans.