MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0035-1040(05)84365-x

Медицинская библиотека · Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur · 2005

[Arthroscopic resection of pigmented villonodular synovitis pseudotumor of the shoulder: a case report with three year follow-up].

Chiffolot X, Ehlinger M, Bonnomet F, Kempf J F

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Pigmented villonodular synovitis can be localized or diffuse. Lesions predominate in the knee but all of the joints can be involved. Thirty cases in the glenohumeral joint have been reported in the literature. The different reports to date have not identified any specific clinical signs. Our female patient presented non-specific shoulder pain which persisted for three years. The plain x-rays were normal. MRI and arthroscan revealed an intra-articular pseudotumor. Arthroscopy was performed for tumor biopsy which was followed by total resection. The diagnosis of villonodular synovitis pseudotumor suspected at arthroscopy was confirmed at the pathology examination. The functional outcome was excellent and no recurrence has been observed at three years follow-up. Arthroscopy is less aggressive than open surgery for arthrotomy. Arthroscopy must be performed for diagnostic purposes since imaging findings are not specific. Arthroscopic synovectomy is the treatment of choice for pigmented villonodular synovitis in both the diffuse and pseudotumor forms.

Для цитирования: Chiffolot X, Ehlinger M, Bonnomet F, Kempf J F. [Arthroscopic resection of pigmented villonodular synovitis pseudotumor of the shoulder: a case report with three year follow-up].. Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/s0035-1040(05)84365-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.