The Journal of infection · 2024
The modern face of esophageal candidiasis in an oncology center: Correlating clinical manifestations, endoscopic grade, and pathological data in 323 contemporary cancer patients.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Matsuo Takahiro, Singh Ben S, Wurster Sebastian, Jiang Ying, Bhutani Manoop S, Chatterjee Deyali, Kontoyiannis Dimitrios P
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Clinical presentation and outcomes of esophageal candidiasis (EC) in cancer patients are scarcely studied in the azole era, as is the correlation between clinical, endoscopic, and histopathological EC manifestations.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the risk factors, clinical features, and outcomes of pathology-documented EC cases at MD Anderson Cancer Center. We further assessed associations between presence of symptoms, standardized 4-stage endoscopic grade (Kodsi classification), histopathological data, and fluconazole treatment failure.
RESULTS: Among 323 cancer patients with EC, 89% had solid tumors, most commonly esophageal cancer (29%). Thirty-three percent of EC patients were asymptomatic. The proportion of symptomatic EC patients significantly increased with endoscopic grade (P = 0.005). Among 202 patients receiving oral fluconazole, 27 (13%) had treatment failure. Underlying esophageal disease was the only independent predictor of fluconazole treatment failure (odds ratio: 3.88, P = 0.005). Endoscopic grade correlated significantly with Candida organism burden (Correlation coefficient [ρ] = 0.21, P < 0.01) and neutrophilic inflammation (ρ = 0.18, P < 0.01). Candida invasion of the squamous mucosal layer was associated with treatment failure (P = 0.049).
CONCLUSIONS: EC was predominantly encountered in patients with solid tumors. One-third of EC patients were asymptomatic, challenging traditional symptom-based diagnosis. The development of integrated clinicopathological scoring systems could further guide the therapeutic management of cancer patients with EC.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the risk factors, clinical features, and outcomes of pathology-documented EC cases at MD Anderson Cancer Center. We further assessed associations between presence of symptoms, standardized 4-stage endoscopic grade (Kodsi classification), histopathological data, and fluconazole treatment failure.
RESULTS: Among 323 cancer patients with EC, 89% had solid tumors, most commonly esophageal cancer (29%). Thirty-three percent of EC patients were asymptomatic. The proportion of symptomatic EC patients significantly increased with endoscopic grade (P = 0.005). Among 202 patients receiving oral fluconazole, 27 (13%) had treatment failure. Underlying esophageal disease was the only independent predictor of fluconazole treatment failure (odds ratio: 3.88, P = 0.005). Endoscopic grade correlated significantly with Candida organism burden (Correlation coefficient [ρ] = 0.21, P < 0.01) and neutrophilic inflammation (ρ = 0.18, P < 0.01). Candida invasion of the squamous mucosal layer was associated with treatment failure (P = 0.049).
CONCLUSIONS: EC was predominantly encountered in patients with solid tumors. One-third of EC patients were asymptomatic, challenging traditional symptom-based diagnosis. The development of integrated clinicopathological scoring systems could further guide the therapeutic management of cancer patients with EC.