Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie · 1996
[Electrovaporization of the prostate (EVP) for the treatment of prostatic adenoma].
Клиническое исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Colombel M, Desgripes A, Bohin D, Chopin D, Abbou C
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: Electrovaporization of the prostate consists of the use of a high energy section current to destroy hyperplastic prostatic tissue. The authors present the preliminary results obtained with this new technique.
METHOD: 15 patients presenting indications for transurethral resection of the prostate were included in this prospective study. Three patients were in complete retention. Three patients presented a high operative risk (ASA 3). Electrovaporization of the prostatic tissue was performed according to the plans of resection using a round loop and a pure section current of 250 to 300 W.
RESULTS: The mean operating time was 22 min (+/- 13) for a mean prostatic weight of 43 g (+/- 7.7). No immediate postoperative haematuria was observed. The duration of catheterization was 2.2 days, and the mean hospital stay was 2.8 days (range: 2-4 days). With a minimum follow-up of 6 months, all patients were improved with an average flow rate of 22.17 +/- 8.6 mL/s, and a score less than 7. Two patients developed haematuria on D5 and D7, one patient developed resorption hyponatraemia and one patient died on D2 from acute respiratory failure.
CONCLUSION: EVP is an effective new resection technique designed to limit postoperative morbidity and the length of hospital stay, which uses inexpensive material. A randomized study versus loop resection should allow identification of the advantages of this technique.
METHOD: 15 patients presenting indications for transurethral resection of the prostate were included in this prospective study. Three patients were in complete retention. Three patients presented a high operative risk (ASA 3). Electrovaporization of the prostatic tissue was performed according to the plans of resection using a round loop and a pure section current of 250 to 300 W.
RESULTS: The mean operating time was 22 min (+/- 13) for a mean prostatic weight of 43 g (+/- 7.7). No immediate postoperative haematuria was observed. The duration of catheterization was 2.2 days, and the mean hospital stay was 2.8 days (range: 2-4 days). With a minimum follow-up of 6 months, all patients were improved with an average flow rate of 22.17 +/- 8.6 mL/s, and a score less than 7. Two patients developed haematuria on D5 and D7, one patient developed resorption hyponatraemia and one patient died on D2 from acute respiratory failure.
CONCLUSION: EVP is an effective new resection technique designed to limit postoperative morbidity and the length of hospital stay, which uses inexpensive material. A randomized study versus loop resection should allow identification of the advantages of this technique.