Journal francais d'ophtalmologie · 2023
Laser in situ keratomileusis and surface ablation in pregnancy.
Многоцентровое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alonso-Santander N, Ortega-Usobiaga J, Beltrán-Sanz J, Druchkiv V, Llovet-Osuna F, Baviera-Sabater J
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Although corneal refractive surgery is contraindicated during pregnancy, some patients are unaware that they are pregnant when they undergo surgery. Our objectives were to determine the functional outcomes of corneal refractive surgery during pregnancy and to compare the results with those of nonpregnant women.
METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective, interventional case series review of patients who were pregnant and who underwent laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or surface ablation (photorefractive keratectomy, PRK) from September 11, 2002 to December 12, 2020 (group 1, n=82 eyes). Patients were included consecutively. Findings were compared with those of nonpregnant women (group 2, n=164 eyes). Functional (visual and refractive) outcomes are described. Follow-up was at least 550 days (control group, median [IQR], 990 days [715-1496]; study group, 895 days [709-1310]). The setting was Clínica Baviera, Spain, (AIER Eye Hospital Group).
RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of efficacy index (EI). No complications of pregnancy or labor were reported. Similarly, a search of medical records revealed no adverse effects in the infants.
CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case series on pregnancy and refractive surgery. We do not recommend performing LASIK or surface ablation on pregnant women. Our objective in the present study was to present relevant scientific data obtained from women who underwent refractive surgery while unaware that they were pregnant.
METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective, interventional case series review of patients who were pregnant and who underwent laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or surface ablation (photorefractive keratectomy, PRK) from September 11, 2002 to December 12, 2020 (group 1, n=82 eyes). Patients were included consecutively. Findings were compared with those of nonpregnant women (group 2, n=164 eyes). Functional (visual and refractive) outcomes are described. Follow-up was at least 550 days (control group, median [IQR], 990 days [715-1496]; study group, 895 days [709-1310]). The setting was Clínica Baviera, Spain, (AIER Eye Hospital Group).
RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of efficacy index (EI). No complications of pregnancy or labor were reported. Similarly, a search of medical records revealed no adverse effects in the infants.
CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case series on pregnancy and refractive surgery. We do not recommend performing LASIK or surface ablation on pregnant women. Our objective in the present study was to present relevant scientific data obtained from women who underwent refractive surgery while unaware that they were pregnant.