Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995) · 2013
Effect of pupil size on uncorrected visual acuity in pseudophakic eyes with astigmatism.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Watanabe Kazuhiro, Negishi Kazuno, Dogru Murat, Yamaguchi Takefumi, Torii Hidemasa, Tsubota Kazuo
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To study the effect of pupil size on the relationship between refractive astigmatism and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and pseudoaccommodation in pseudophakic eyes.
METHODS: Thirty-six eyes from 36 patients who underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation were included. All eyes were divided into two groups based on the presence of postoperative-with-the-rule astigmatism or against-the-rule astigmatism. Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refractive astigmatism, subjective accommodation amplitude, and pupil sizes under photopic and mesopic conditions were measured 1 month postoperatively. The effects of pupil size on the relationship between refractive astigmatism and UDVA were investigated.
RESULTS: Against-the-rule astigmatism had a moderate but significant negative linear correlation with UDVA irrespective of the pupil size (R(2)=0.60, P<.01). A moderate but significant negative linear correlation was found when the pupil diameter exceeded 2.9 mm in eyes with with-the-rule astigmatism (R(2)=0.46, P=.04). Refractive astigmatism was not significantly correlated with pseudoaccommodation regardless of the pupil diameter in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study suggest that pupil size may have an impact on postoperative UDVA in eyes having against-the-rule astigmatism and in eyes with a large pupil diameter and with-the-rule astigmatism.
METHODS: Thirty-six eyes from 36 patients who underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation were included. All eyes were divided into two groups based on the presence of postoperative-with-the-rule astigmatism or against-the-rule astigmatism. Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refractive astigmatism, subjective accommodation amplitude, and pupil sizes under photopic and mesopic conditions were measured 1 month postoperatively. The effects of pupil size on the relationship between refractive astigmatism and UDVA were investigated.
RESULTS: Against-the-rule astigmatism had a moderate but significant negative linear correlation with UDVA irrespective of the pupil size (R(2)=0.60, P<.01). A moderate but significant negative linear correlation was found when the pupil diameter exceeded 2.9 mm in eyes with with-the-rule astigmatism (R(2)=0.46, P=.04). Refractive astigmatism was not significantly correlated with pseudoaccommodation regardless of the pupil diameter in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study suggest that pupil size may have an impact on postoperative UDVA in eyes having against-the-rule astigmatism and in eyes with a large pupil diameter and with-the-rule astigmatism.