Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2019
Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of lumen-apposing metal stents and anti-migrating tubular self-expandable metal stents for EUS-guided gallbladder drainage in high surgical risk patients with acute cholecystitis.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cho Sung Hyun, Oh Dongwook, Song Tae Jun, Park Do Hyun, Seo Dong-Wan, Lee Sung Koo, Kim Myung-Hwan, Lee Yun Nah, Moon Jong Ho, Lee Sang Soo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) using an anti-migrating tubular self-expandable metal stent (ATSEMS) is performed in high surgical risk patients with acute cholecystitis. The newly introduced lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) is expected to reduce the risk of tubular self-expandable metal stent-related adverse events such as stent migration, but no comparative studies have been carried out between LAMSs and ATSEMSs for EUS-GBD.
METHODS: We reviewed the prospectively collected EUS-GBD database at Asan Medical Center and Bucheon Soonchunhyang hospital to analyze consecutive patients with acute cholecystitis who underwent EUS-GBD with LAMSs or ATSEMSs between January 2015 and December 2017. Technical success, clinical success, adverse events, and recurrence of cholecystitis were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 71 patients (36 with LAMSs, 35 with ATSEMSs) were analyzed. The LAMS group had longer median procedure time (15.5 minutes) than the ATSEMS group (11 minutes; P = .017). The 2 groups did not show significant differences in terms of technical success (LAMS, 94% vs ATSEMS, 100%; P = .49), clinical success (94% vs 100%; P = .49), procedure-related adverse events (0% vs 2.9%; P = .99), and stent-related late adverse events (11.8% vs 5.8%; P = .43). During follow-up, the 2 groups had similar rates of cholecystitis recurrence at 6 months (LAMS, 3.4% vs ATSEMS, 3.1%, P = .99) and 12 months (8.3% vs 3.1%, P = .56).
CONCLUSIONS: In high surgical risk patients with acute cholecystitis, LAMSs and ATSEMSs for EUS-GBD showed similar rates of technical success, clinical success, procedure-related adverse events, stent-related late adverse events, and recurrence of cholecystitis.
METHODS: We reviewed the prospectively collected EUS-GBD database at Asan Medical Center and Bucheon Soonchunhyang hospital to analyze consecutive patients with acute cholecystitis who underwent EUS-GBD with LAMSs or ATSEMSs between January 2015 and December 2017. Technical success, clinical success, adverse events, and recurrence of cholecystitis were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 71 patients (36 with LAMSs, 35 with ATSEMSs) were analyzed. The LAMS group had longer median procedure time (15.5 minutes) than the ATSEMS group (11 minutes; P = .017). The 2 groups did not show significant differences in terms of technical success (LAMS, 94% vs ATSEMS, 100%; P = .49), clinical success (94% vs 100%; P = .49), procedure-related adverse events (0% vs 2.9%; P = .99), and stent-related late adverse events (11.8% vs 5.8%; P = .43). During follow-up, the 2 groups had similar rates of cholecystitis recurrence at 6 months (LAMS, 3.4% vs ATSEMS, 3.1%, P = .99) and 12 months (8.3% vs 3.1%, P = .56).
CONCLUSIONS: In high surgical risk patients with acute cholecystitis, LAMSs and ATSEMSs for EUS-GBD showed similar rates of technical success, clinical success, procedure-related adverse events, stent-related late adverse events, and recurrence of cholecystitis.