Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery · 2017
Arthroscopic ablation of an osteoid osteoma of the elbow: a case series with a minimum of 18 months' follow-up.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kamrani Reza Shahryar, Moradi Amirhossein, Sharafat Vaziri Arash, Nabian Mohammad Hossein, Ghane Bahareh
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic excision of an osteoid osteoma was first reported in the knee joint; since then, there have been several reports of arthroscopic excisions in the knee, shoulder, and elbow, with inconclusive outcomes because of a limited number of cases. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the medium-term functional effects of arthroscopic ablation in cases of an osteoid osteoma around the elbow.
METHODS: We treated osteoid osteoma of the elbow through arthroscopic ablation in 10 patients. The arthroscopic resection procedure was performed 23 ± 9 months (range, 12-36 months) after initial symptoms. At the preoperative examination and last follow-up examination, the elbow flexion-extension and forearm supination-pronation ranges of motion were measured. The patients were assessed by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, the visual analog scale for the elbow and wrist, and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score. Finally, the patients' general satisfaction was assessed.
RESULTS: The postoperative elbow flexion-extension range of motion was significantly higher compared with range of motion before surgery (P = .001; r = 0.86). According to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, the average score increased significantly at the final follow-up examination. The mean preoperative and final Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores were 47 ± 14 and 1.6 ± 2.8, respectively (P < .001). All patients were satisfied with the operation result.
CONCLUSION: According to the results of our study, arthroscopic ablation is a safe and efficient method of treatment for osteoid osteoma of the elbow, with a fast rehabilitation time.
METHODS: We treated osteoid osteoma of the elbow through arthroscopic ablation in 10 patients. The arthroscopic resection procedure was performed 23 ± 9 months (range, 12-36 months) after initial symptoms. At the preoperative examination and last follow-up examination, the elbow flexion-extension and forearm supination-pronation ranges of motion were measured. The patients were assessed by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, the visual analog scale for the elbow and wrist, and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score. Finally, the patients' general satisfaction was assessed.
RESULTS: The postoperative elbow flexion-extension range of motion was significantly higher compared with range of motion before surgery (P = .001; r = 0.86). According to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, the average score increased significantly at the final follow-up examination. The mean preoperative and final Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores were 47 ± 14 and 1.6 ± 2.8, respectively (P < .001). All patients were satisfied with the operation result.
CONCLUSION: According to the results of our study, arthroscopic ablation is a safe and efficient method of treatment for osteoid osteoma of the elbow, with a fast rehabilitation time.