American heart journal · 2002
Effects of the thromboxane synthetase inhibitor and receptor antagonist terbogrel in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Langleben David, Christman Brian W, Barst Robyn J, Dias Virgil C, Galiè Nazzareno, Higenbottam Timothy W, Kneussl Meinhard, Korducki Larry, Naeije Robert, Riedel Axel, Simonneau Gerald, Hirsch Andrew M, Rich Stuart, Robbins Ivan M, Oudiz Ronald, McGoon Michael D, Badesch David B, Levy Robert D, Mehta Sanjay, Seeger Werner, Solèr Markus
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Circulating mediators, including thromboxane A2, the vasoconstrictor, platelet aggregant, and smooth muscle mitogen, may contribute to the progression of vascular narrowing in primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH).
METHODS: To further understand the contribution of thromboxane and to provide novel therapy for PPH, we administered the potent orally active thromboxane synthetase inhibitor and thromboxane receptor antagonist terbogrel for 12 weeks to patients with New York Heart Association functional classification II and III PPH. The study had a multicenter randomized placebo-controlled design. The primary endpoint was a change in the distance walked during 6 minutes. The pharmacologic effects of terbogrel on thromboxane and prostacyclin metabolism also were studied.
RESULTS: Although the planned enrollment was 135 patients, the study was halted after only 71 patients had been randomized because of the unforeseen side effect of leg pain, which occurred almost exclusively in patients with terbogrel treatment. Only 52 patients completed the 12-week study, and only 22 patients (31%) were fully compliant with the study medication. The leg pain confounded the primary endpoint of walking distance. On an intention-to-treat analysis, no improvements in 6-minute walk distance or in hemodynamics in patients with terbogrel treatment were seen. However, terbogrel was effective from a pharmacologic standpoint, reducing thromboxane metabolites by as much as 98% (P <.0001), with a modest but statistically insignificant (39%) rise in prostacyclin metabolites.
CONCLUSION: Inhibition of thromboxane with an orally active agent is feasible in PPH, but the incidence of severe leg pain with terbogrel precludes its use in this disorder. Similar therapeutic efforts, with other thromboxane inhibitors, should be considered.
METHODS: To further understand the contribution of thromboxane and to provide novel therapy for PPH, we administered the potent orally active thromboxane synthetase inhibitor and thromboxane receptor antagonist terbogrel for 12 weeks to patients with New York Heart Association functional classification II and III PPH. The study had a multicenter randomized placebo-controlled design. The primary endpoint was a change in the distance walked during 6 minutes. The pharmacologic effects of terbogrel on thromboxane and prostacyclin metabolism also were studied.
RESULTS: Although the planned enrollment was 135 patients, the study was halted after only 71 patients had been randomized because of the unforeseen side effect of leg pain, which occurred almost exclusively in patients with terbogrel treatment. Only 52 patients completed the 12-week study, and only 22 patients (31%) were fully compliant with the study medication. The leg pain confounded the primary endpoint of walking distance. On an intention-to-treat analysis, no improvements in 6-minute walk distance or in hemodynamics in patients with terbogrel treatment were seen. However, terbogrel was effective from a pharmacologic standpoint, reducing thromboxane metabolites by as much as 98% (P <.0001), with a modest but statistically insignificant (39%) rise in prostacyclin metabolites.
CONCLUSION: Inhibition of thromboxane with an orally active agent is feasible in PPH, but the incidence of severe leg pain with terbogrel precludes its use in this disorder. Similar therapeutic efforts, with other thromboxane inhibitors, should be considered.