Evaluation of Simpler Criteria for Diagnosing Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis Complicating Asthma.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The modified International Society for Human and Animal Mycology (ISHAM) allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) working group (AWG) criteria lists up to five components for diagnosing ABPA in asthmatics. Whether eliminating specific components of the existing criteria would have the same diagnostic utility as the original remains unknown.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the performance of several simplified criteria for diagnosing ABPA.
METHODS
We compared the performance of seven new criteria (after excluding or modifying one or more of the components of the ISHAM-AWG criteria) with the modified ISHAM-AWG criteria in asthmatic subjects using latent class analysis (LCA). We also tested the performance of the newer criteria using accuracy measures against a multidisciplinary team (MDT) diagnosis of ABPA. We considered the diagnostic accuracy of the newer criteria to be acceptable if the correct classification and false-negative rates were >95% and <5%, respectively, on an MDT evaluation.
RESULTS
We analyzed data from 543 asthmatic subjects (58.8% women; mean age, 36.8 years). Using LCA, the sensitivity of the A.fumigatus-specific IgE-based criteria ranged from 92-99%, while the specificity varied between 92% and 100%. The MDT diagnosed ABPA in 106 (19.5%) subjects. Using MDT as the reference standard, the correct classification and false-negative rates were >95% for three of the seven and <5% for four of the seven newer criteria.
CONCLUSIONS
We found several of the newly developed criteria to perform, like the modified ISHAM-AWG criteria, for diagnosing ABPA complicating asthma. A prospective study in current clinical algorithms is required for validating our observations.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.