Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine · 2026
Current practices and harmonization challenges in Alzheimer's disease biomarkers: an EFLM Committee: Harmonization Survey.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Agnello Luisa, Dukic Lora, Akvlediani Leila, Zaninotto Martina, European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Committee: Harmonisation (C:H)
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Fluid biomarkers are central to the biological definition and diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Despite international recommendations, substantial variability persists in laboratory practices. This survey, promoted by the Committee: Harmonisation (C:H) of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM), aimed to assess real-world laboratory practices for AD biomarker testing.
METHODS: An online survey was distributed to EFLM members. The questionnaire addressed pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical practices for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood-based AD biomarkers. Descriptive statistics were applied.
RESULTS: A total of 316 responses from more than 35 countries were collected. CSF remained the primary matrix for AD diagnostics, although blood-based biomarkers were increasingly implemented. Marked heterogeneity was observed across all phases of testing, including sample handling, assay platforms, biomarker panels, and decisional cut-offs. Cut-off values for core biomarkers varied widely, as well as harmonization of reporting unit and the adoption of SI units preventing a shared approach to interpreting the results.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite growing clinical adoption, AD biomarker testing remains highly heterogeneous. Coordinated international harmonization of pre-analytical procedures, analytical methods, and post-analytical interpretation, particularly for blood-based biomarkers, is urgently required to ensure reliable and comparable results.
METHODS: An online survey was distributed to EFLM members. The questionnaire addressed pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical practices for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood-based AD biomarkers. Descriptive statistics were applied.
RESULTS: A total of 316 responses from more than 35 countries were collected. CSF remained the primary matrix for AD diagnostics, although blood-based biomarkers were increasingly implemented. Marked heterogeneity was observed across all phases of testing, including sample handling, assay platforms, biomarker panels, and decisional cut-offs. Cut-off values for core biomarkers varied widely, as well as harmonization of reporting unit and the adoption of SI units preventing a shared approach to interpreting the results.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite growing clinical adoption, AD biomarker testing remains highly heterogeneous. Coordinated international harmonization of pre-analytical procedures, analytical methods, and post-analytical interpretation, particularly for blood-based biomarkers, is urgently required to ensure reliable and comparable results.