MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.1.063

Медицинская библиотека · Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2012

Satisfaction in the National Cancer Screening Program for breast cancer with and without clinical breast examination.

Han Mi Ah, Jun Jae Kwan, Choi Kui Son, Park Eun-Cheol, Lee Hoo-Yeon

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether screening by clinical breast examination (CBE) in addition to mammography affected participant satisfaction in the National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP). Data were derived from the Quality Evaluation of National Cancer Screening satisfaction survey. This population-based nationwide telephone survey included participants who had been screened by the NCSP for breast cancer between June and August 2010 (n=2,370), and collected information on satisfaction with screening and screening service use. Five multiple regression models were used to determine satisfaction according to screening method, and according to each of five satisfaction measures (pre- screening information transfer, staff interpersonal skills, physical surroundings, reporting of results and general satisfaction). A total of 1,858 (78.4%) participants were screened by mammography alone and 512 (21.6%) by both mammography and CBE. Satisfaction was significantly higher in subjects screened by both mammography and CBE compared with those screened by mammography alone.

Для цитирования: Han Mi Ah, Jun Jae Kwan, Choi Kui Son, Park Eun-Cheol, Lee Hoo-Yeon. Satisfaction in the National Cancer Screening Program for breast cancer with and without clinical breast examination.. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP. 2012. DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.1.063.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.