MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/brs.0000000000005343

Медицинская библиотека · Spine · 2025

Associations Between Problem List Items and Clinically Significant Distress in Patients With Metastatic Spine Disease.

Rowe Dana G, Woo Joshua, Yoo Seeley, Emerson Jacqueline M, O'Callaghan Ellen, Goodin Michael, Crowell Kerri-Anne, Bradley Victoria, Reynolds Jeremy, Johnson Margaret O, Erickson Melissa M, Goodwin C Rory

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify sources of distress in patients with metastatic spine disease and elucidate factors associated with clinically significant distress.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Distress is associated with poorer outcomes and lower quality of life in cancer patients. Patients with metastatic spine disease are particularly vulnerable to clinically significant levels of distress. However, specific factors contributing to distress in these patients have been largely unexplored.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with metastatic spine disease (MSD) who underwent surgery from 2015 to 2023. We analyzed National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer (DT) scores and Problem List items within 30 days before surgery, which was defined as "baseline" distress. We calculated the frequency of each problem and the proportion of patients with clinically significant distress (DT score ≥4). We used χ 2 tests to analyze associations between Problem List items and significant distress, with a significance threshold of P <0.05.

RESULTS

Among 160 patients with MSD, 48.1% reported clinically significant distress. Patients most frequently reported Physical concerns (93.8%), followed by Emotional (55.6%) and Practical concerns (31.9%). The most common individual Problem List item was pain (72.5%), followed by fatigue (48.1%) and worry (41.2%). Emotional ( P =0.001), Practical ( P =0.04), and Social concerns ( P =0.039) were significantly associated with clinically significant distress, but Physical concerns were not ( P =0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Though physical concerns were most common for patients with MSD, emotional and practical concerns were more strongly associated with significant distress among patients with metastatic spine disease. These findings highlight the need for multidisciplinary care focused on emotional and practical issues to enhance patients' quality of life.

Для цитирования: Rowe Dana G, Woo Joshua, Yoo Seeley, Emerson Jacqueline M, O'Callaghan Ellen, Goodin Michael, Crowell Kerri-Anne, Bradley Victoria, Reynolds Jeremy, Johnson Margaret O, Erickson Melissa M, Goodwin C Rory. Associations Between Problem List Items and Clinically Significant Distress in Patients With Metastatic Spine Disease.. Spine. 2025. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000005343.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.