Diabetes & metabolic syndrome · 2020
Intra-abdominal fat estimation by bio-electrical impedance analysis in patients with fibrocalculous pancreatic diabetes compared with BMI matched type 2 diabetic subjects and healthy controls.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shivaprasad Channabasappa, Gautham Kolla, Palani Preethika, Gupta Soumya, Shah Kejal
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Intra-abdominal adipose tissue (IAAT) is a major contributor to insulin resistance (IR) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). Prior studies have demonstrated evidence of IR in fibrocalculous pancreatic diabetes (FCPD). However, no data exists on IAAT estimation in FCPD. Hence, we compared IAAT area among FCPD patients and an equal number of body mass index (BMI) matched T2D patients and healthy controls.
METHODS: We recruited 60 patients with FCPD between January 2019 and February 2020. Body composition analysis was performed via bio-electrical impedance analysis.
RESULTS: The mean ages were 37.82 ± 10.07, 51.02 ± 9.9, and 30.7 ± 11.51 years for patients in the FCPD, T2D, and control groups, respectively. The mean BMI of patients in the three groups was 20.65 ± 2.01, 20.83 ± 1.49, and 20.91 ± 1.59 kg/m2, respectively (P = 0.684). The mean IAAT area of patients in the FCPD, T2D, and control groups was 67.93 ± 43.38, 117.78 ± 48.03, and 100.52 ± 42.31 cm2, respectively. IAAT was significantly lower in patients with FCPD compared with those in the other two groups (P < 0.0001). In the entire cohort, IAAT showed significant positive correlation with age (r = 0.20), abdominal circumference (r = 0.80), waist hip ratio (r = 0.75), and LDL level (r = 0.25) (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with FCPD have significantly lower IAAT compared to BMI matched T2D subjects and healthy controls. IAAT does not appear to be a major contributor to insulin resistance observed in patients with FCPD.
METHODS: We recruited 60 patients with FCPD between January 2019 and February 2020. Body composition analysis was performed via bio-electrical impedance analysis.
RESULTS: The mean ages were 37.82 ± 10.07, 51.02 ± 9.9, and 30.7 ± 11.51 years for patients in the FCPD, T2D, and control groups, respectively. The mean BMI of patients in the three groups was 20.65 ± 2.01, 20.83 ± 1.49, and 20.91 ± 1.59 kg/m2, respectively (P = 0.684). The mean IAAT area of patients in the FCPD, T2D, and control groups was 67.93 ± 43.38, 117.78 ± 48.03, and 100.52 ± 42.31 cm2, respectively. IAAT was significantly lower in patients with FCPD compared with those in the other two groups (P < 0.0001). In the entire cohort, IAAT showed significant positive correlation with age (r = 0.20), abdominal circumference (r = 0.80), waist hip ratio (r = 0.75), and LDL level (r = 0.25) (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with FCPD have significantly lower IAAT compared to BMI matched T2D subjects and healthy controls. IAAT does not appear to be a major contributor to insulin resistance observed in patients with FCPD.