MedElevator
Войти в исследования Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement · 2008
Ischemic events after carotid interventions in relationship to baseline cerebrovascular reactivity.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wong George K C, Ng Stephanie C P, Chan Matthew T V, Sun David T F, Lam Winnie W M, Lam Joseph M K, Poon Wai S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate whether baseline cerebrovascular reactivity could predict subsequent ischemic event after intervention and identify the patient group for more aggressive medical and interventional management paradigms.
METHODS: Patients with more than 70% cervical carotid stenosis (from ultrasonography) were reviewed. Patients, who had baseline cerebrovascular reactivity test before intervention and had either carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) performed, were recruited for analysis. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography was used to examine the reactivity of the middle cerebral artery in response to 5% carbon dioxide in oxygen. The mean follow up period was 66 months.
FINDINGS: Twenty-six patients had symptomatic carotid stenosis and ten patients had asymptomatic carotid stenosis. There were four subsequent ischemic events during follow up. None of the nine patients with impaired baseline ipsilateral cerebrovascular reactivity had subsequent ischemic event.
CONCLUSIONS: In this current study, impaired baseline cerebrovascular reactivity did not predict the subsequent stroke risk after carotid intervention. Cerebrovascular reactivity testing may not serve as an indicator for aggressive medical and surgical treatments.
METHODS: Patients with more than 70% cervical carotid stenosis (from ultrasonography) were reviewed. Patients, who had baseline cerebrovascular reactivity test before intervention and had either carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) performed, were recruited for analysis. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography was used to examine the reactivity of the middle cerebral artery in response to 5% carbon dioxide in oxygen. The mean follow up period was 66 months.
FINDINGS: Twenty-six patients had symptomatic carotid stenosis and ten patients had asymptomatic carotid stenosis. There were four subsequent ischemic events during follow up. None of the nine patients with impaired baseline ipsilateral cerebrovascular reactivity had subsequent ischemic event.
CONCLUSIONS: In this current study, impaired baseline cerebrovascular reactivity did not predict the subsequent stroke risk after carotid intervention. Cerebrovascular reactivity testing may not serve as an indicator for aggressive medical and surgical treatments.