MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.2880170610

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 1995

Prognosis of recurrent laryngeal carcinoma after laryngectomy.

Yuen A P, Ho C M, Wei W I, Lam L K

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Recurrence is common after total laryngectomy for advanced laryngeal carcinoma. The aim of the present study was to review the prognosis of recurrent laryngeal carcinoma after total laryngectomy.

METHODS

The records of 165 patients who developed recurrences after total laryngectomy for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma between January 1971 and December 1990 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Of the 165 patients who developed recurrences, 34 (21%) patients had surgical salvage. The sites of recurrence of these 34 operable patients included 11 pharyngeal, 3 tracheostomal, 15 nodal, 2 pharyngeal with nodal, and 3 pulmonary metastasis. Pharyngeal recurrence had the highest salvage rate, followed by nodal and pulmonary recurrence. All patients with tracheostomal had recurrence after salvage surgery. After the surgical salvage, the tumor recurrence rate was 44% and the 5-year actuarial survival rate was 42%. Of the other 131 patients who had palliative treatment without surgical salvage, the 5-year actuarial survival rate was 2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that patients who had surgical salvage for recurrent tumor after total laryngectomy had satisfactory prognosis. Close follow-up of patients after initial operation is essential to detect recurrence early, while surgical salvage is still feasible.

Для цитирования: Yuen A P, Ho C M, Wei W I, Lam L K. Prognosis of recurrent laryngeal carcinoma after laryngectomy.. Head & neck. 1995. DOI: 10.1002/hed.2880170610.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.