MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.12.013

Медицинская библиотека · Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease · 2009

A comparison of the fungicidal activity of amphotericin B and posaconazole against Zygomycetes in vitro.

Krishnan-Natesan Suganthini, Manavathu Elias K, Alangaden George J, Chandrasekar Pranatharthi H

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Zygomycoses is a rapidly progressive infection associated with high mortality. Although amphotericin B (AMB) has been the only treatment option for years, recent studies have demonstrated that posaconazole (PCZ) has good activity against Zygomycetes. Because rapid onset of antifungal activity is crucial in the management and never studied before, we compared the time for maximum fungicidal activity of AMB versus PCZ using time-kill curves. The MIC of AMB and PCZ against clinical isolates of Mucor spp. and Rhizopus spp. was determined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M38-A2 method, and the fungicidal activity was examined by time-kill studies. AMB was rapidly fungicidal, with 95% killing noted as early as 6 h and 99.9% killing at 24 h; PCZ showed <70% killing at 6 h and 99.9% killing at 48 h. In vivo animal studies using AMB in the early phase, followed by a switch to high-dose PCZ later, could provide data that may have clinical implications because there are only a few drugs currently available for the management of zygomycoses.

Для цитирования: Krishnan-Natesan Suganthini, Manavathu Elias K, Alangaden George J, Chandrasekar Pranatharthi H. A comparison of the fungicidal activity of amphotericin B and posaconazole against Zygomycetes in vitro.. Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.12.013.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.