MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf00170978

Медицинская библиотека · Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 1989

Electrophysiology and perimetry in acute retrobulbar neuritis.

Berninger T A, Heider W

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Eighteen patients with acute retrobulbar neuritis were examined by visual field analysis and electroophthalmological recordings. The visual fields were measured to 30 degrees with the automatic perimeter Octopus 201. The pattern-evoked cortical potential showed an increased P-100 latency followed by a decrease in 12 patients during the first two weeks of the disease. This latency change cannot be explained by remyelinization. Teh positive component of the pattern ERG (P-50) was reduced in all acutely affected eyes in comparison with the fellow eye. During recovery, the amplitude of the positive PERG component increased to normal, but remained slightly reduced in comparison with the response from the fellow eyes. Thirteen patients out of 18 were clinically and electrophysiologically diagnosed as having unilateral retrobulbar neuritis. However, static perimetry showed paracentral scotomas in the fellow eye in 5 cases. Recovery of the severely affected eye was accompanied by complete normalization of the visual field in the fellow eye. Thus static perimetry seems to be a more sensitive test than even the visual evoked potentials for detecting lesions in the visual pathway.

Для цитирования: Berninger T A, Heider W. Electrophysiology and perimetry in acute retrobulbar neuritis.. Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology. 1989. DOI: 10.1007/bf00170978.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.